02-05-2014 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 05, 2014 Page 4 of 5 Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan on 1/27/2014. Parks Commission reviewed on 1/30/2014. Parks commission would prefer dedication fees in lieu of a new larger park. It would also be in favor of a few smaller pocket or neighborhood parks. Overall, the Parks Commission would like the dedication fees be used to improve or connect to Reid Park and the Old Village. Council Member Reeves expounded on the Parks Commission’s preferences. They took a very holistic view of the neighborhood and primarily focusing on the parks and connections. The length of the cul-de-sacs was discussed. There are 3 or 4 proposed that do not currently meet the city requirements. Council Member Smith wants neighborhood to be more walk-able, as that was the vision for the Village. Planning Commission Chair wants the Planning Commission to discuss the cul-de-sacs at next meeting. Todd Erickson, engineer for project, provided his overview of the proposal. Mayor Pearson stated that he is in agreement with much of the Parks Commission input regarding connectivity. The collector road entering neighborhood and the access to 30th Street should be reevaluated. Mr. Reeves noted that this is the first development in the Village and will set the pace. The issue of neighborhood interaction was discussed vis-à-vis cul-de-sacs versus grid plans. Steve DeLapp 8468 Lake Jane Trail spoke about the proposal. He reiterated that Village connectivity was really important. Concerns about the location and related challenges must be addressed. No formal action requested. ITEM 12: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT TO SUNSET MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL City Administrator Zuleger explained the letter from the Met Council outlining the terms of termination and the history of how the MOU came about. Terms include: Proof of payment for Section 34 development improvements and Lake Elmo Ave Sewer Infrastructure. City is anticipating complying in mid-March. Noted that if the MOU goes away, the City only has to live with the 2040 forecast. Staff recommends acceptance. It was explained that the obligation to grow will still remain post-MOU because the infrastructure is in the ground and has to be paid for. Todd Ptacek 812 Julep Ave. N. spoke about the history of NIMBY in community. He is concerned about increased traffic on and south of 10th St. He urged Council to go forwardly prudently. Mayor Pearson concurs with the shared sentiment that this is a great day for the City. Council Member Smith noted that this will relieve much pressure in the I-94 Corridor. Council Member Bloyer reiterated his opinion that development in the rest of Lake Elmo needs to be addressed so the City can be built out on its own terms and done with trying to comply with similar future Met Council mandates on growth. Ms. Smith read letter Council received from Kathy Sedro, 8916 35th Street N., requesting the government choose the minimum growth numbers while complying with legal commitments. Mr. Bloyer read letter from resident Curt Montieth, 331 Julep Ave N., requesting the Council to limit all future development in the city, impose strict open space requirements, high standards, and require 2.5 acre lots in areas outside of the Village. The letter also requested sufficient recreation spaces. Mr. Zuleger thanked planning staff for all the hard work over the past year to achieve this. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO CONCUR WITH THE TERMS OF TERMINATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO DATED JANUARY 14, 2014, AND INSTRUCT THE CITY