My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2009 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2009
>
04-21-2009 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2025 8:47:38 PM
Creation date
8/1/2017 1:15:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 2009 2 <br />REGULAR AGENDA: <br />Audio visual improvements <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member DeLapp moved to continue the audio visual improvements <br />agenda item until the May 5, 2009 City Council meeting. Council Member Park <br />seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. <br /> <br />Sign Ordinance Revisions – An ordinance repealing existing sign code regulations and <br />adopting new regulations to govern signs in all zoning districts <br /> <br />Ben Gozola, Consulting Planner, presented a proposed ordinance to repeal all existing <br />sign code regulations in favor of revised sign controls. He said the proposed regulations <br />have been drafted in response to public input, and had to remain within constitutional <br />guidelines. The goal of the City is to balance the need for businesses to advertise <br />themselves and to address residents’ aesthetic concerns. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission had held a public hearing and subsequently recommended <br />approval of the proposed ordinance to update the City’s sign regulations as presented. <br /> <br />Neil Krueger, 4452 Lake Elmo Avenue N., believed the entire sign ordinance was very <br />complicated and should be simplified. Deb Krueger noted the size of the lettering on <br />neighborhood signs should be addressed because they were difficult to read. She asked <br />the Council to address signs for residents who want to sell eggs or hay. <br /> <br />Joe Heinen, who owns a building at 9242 Hudson Blvd., believed the sign regulations <br />were too restrictive for a multi-tenant building. <br /> <br />Among the items considered, the Council debated whether neighborhood entrance signs <br />attracted buyers to model homes and helped realtors sell homes or directed people to <br />neighborhoods. The Council agreed on restrictions placed on signs in the Old Village <br />which would have limited illumination and design guidelines imposed on them. There <br />was disagreement on a provision that would allow 12-foot signs in the Old Village. With <br />growth and changes to the City’s comprehensive plan, Council member Emmons <br />suggested looking at the sign criteria for the business corridor along Interstate 94. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member DeLapp moved to table the sign ordinance revision to the <br />May 5, 2009 City Council Meeting. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. The <br />motion passed 5-0. <br /> <br />Update on house rehabilitation, 9224 31st Street N. <br />Ben Gozola, Consulting Planner, reported the City Council entered into an agreement <br />with Linda and David Hardy to address all issues surrounding the house rehabilitation at <br />9224 31st Street. The agreement established a list of 25 items that needed to be <br />completed by April 7, 2009, to allow the City to issue a temporary certificate of <br />occupancy for the house. Staff recommended delaying action until the new City Attorney <br />is on board in early May.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.