Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lake Elmo <br />City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />12 February 2008 <br /> <br />Lake Elmo Fire Hall <br /> <br />Mayor Johnston called the meeting to order 8:40 PM. <br /> <br />Consider a request to engage a law firm to represent the city of Lake Elmo along with Woodbury and <br />Oakdale at the capitol for gaining the PCA bonding bill request for $15 million for remediation of the PFC <br />contamination in the Washington County Landfill. <br /> <br />Administrator Hoyt reported that the city of Woodbury had contacted the cities of Lake Elmo and Oakdale <br />to ask if the cities would be interested in contracting with a legal representative to lobby for funds for the <br />Washington County Landfill remediation at the legislative session, which opened on February 12, 2008. <br />She reported that Oakdale had agreed to join in sharing the costs with Woodbury. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnston reported that he had attended a legislative hearing on the PCA request for funding in the <br />bonding bill and determined that the legislative committee did not seem receptive to the request. He <br />suggested two alternatives to consider: 1) pay a proportion of the cost of fees – about 6% if population of <br />the four cities (Woodbury, Oakdale, Cottage Grove and Lake Elmo); or 2) decline financially supporting <br />the efforts of Woodbury and Oakdale, but to give city support in any way it could to encourage the funds <br />for the Washington County Landfill Clean up. Mayor Johnston supported the latter proposal although he <br />did not support the dig and line as the preferred option and preferred a permanent solution. He also noted <br />the importance of making a statement immediately given the dynamics of funding discussions at the <br />legislature. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johnson concurred with supporting the second option, supporting the bonding request <br />without funds, because she was concerned that the contamination would continue and that other <br />contaminants could result from delay. She reiterated that she preferred a permanent solution. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLapp did not support the $15 million funding request by PCA because it was designed <br />to implement the dig and line option, which he considered a short term option and a very inadequate <br />solution. He stated that supporting this bonding request in 2008 would inevitably result in implementing <br />this inadequate solution. He only supported a permanent solution to the Washington County Landfill <br />contamination which he believed would be the dig and truck option and, joined, by a plasma torch, if <br />possible. Councilmember DeLapp said he is concerned about contamination but believes that the evidence <br />suggests waiting five years is not harmful. He did not believe action was necessary at this meeting. <br /> <br />Citizen Jim Blackford, 9765 45th Street North, presented some historic information on the landfill and PCA <br />plans in the past that were not followed. He described some alternative mechanisms to get a permanent <br />solution to the landfill site. He also said that he understood the political realities of getting funding for any <br />solution. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnston moved to approve the support of the $15 million dollars in the Governor’s bonding bill for <br />the MPCA remediation of contamination at the Washington County Landfill. Councilmember Johnson <br />seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mayor Johnston and Councilmember Johnson voting in favor <br />of the motion and Council member DeLapp voting against. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnston adjourned the meeting at 9:20 PM. <br /> <br /> <br />