Resolution 2015-24 Approving Wildlfower Preliminary Plat and PUD

Home Browse Search

7) That the Wildflower PUD General Concept Plan was approved by the City on June 17, 2014, and the submitted Preliminary Plat and, Preliminary PUD Plans are consistent with the approved General Concept Plan. 8) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD glans are consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. q) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans comply with the City's LDR - Urban Low Density Residential and MDR — Urban Medium Density Residential zoning district requirements with the exceptions as noted in the Staff report. 10) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans comply with the City's subdivision ordinance, with the PUD exceptions as requested by the applicant. 11) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans comply with the City's Planned Unit Development Regulations: 12) That the change in Outlots 0 and P of the Fields of St. Croix is justified because the developer is providing much larger open space areas as part of Wildflower at Lake Elmo. 13) That an exception to the maximum length of a cul-de-sac is justified based on the unique circumstances of the property and the development. 14) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans comply with City's Engineering Standards, except where noted in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated 2/18/15. 1) That the Wildflower preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans comply with other City zoning ordinances, such as landscaping, tree preservation, and erosion and sediment control with the plan revisions as requested by City Staff and consultants. 16) That the Wildflower preliminaryplat and preliminary PUS plans achieve multiple identified objectives for planned developments within. Lake Elmo and are consistent with the City's adopted findings for the Concept Plan, Based on the foregoing, the Applicants' application for a PUD Concept Plan is granted, provided the following conditions are met: 1) No lets within a PEMA flood zone shall be approved as part of final plat until such time that the City's Floodplain Management Map has been amended to remove these lots. As an alternativeto amending this reap, the developer must provide documentation, that all structures will be built above the regulatory flood protection elevation, that any public infrastructure :will also meet F'loodplain Ordinance requirements, and that the proposed storm water ponds may be constructed within the floodplain area. Resolution No. 2015-2