Laserfiche WebLink
Avenue, and 45a` Street; 3) AG Preserve and Green Acres clarification; 4) specific repairs <br />eded on 45t Street and Julep Avenue? <br />Ci Engmeer Prow informed Council the streets are 20 years old, and mainten ce is <br />reco ended. Making the driving lanes narrower — as proposed by the prof t — will <br />help slow down traffic some. <br />M/S/P Johnsto Smith —to return to the July 18, 2006, Council mee ' g for further <br />discussion of Res izon No. 2006-064, ordering improvement fo 006 MSA <br />Resurfacing on 45a eet, Julep Avenue, and 47a' Street. (M on passed 4-0) <br />C. Easement for North'k Watermain: City Engineer Prew inform the Council that they are/aiting for appraisals oD FT <br />easements. `` <br />D. A rove Plans for Eagle PoN Boulevard Resolution No. 2006-064: <br />City Engineer Prew recommended Yar <br />esolution No. 2006-064, approving Plans <br />and Specifications for Eagle Point Bouth of Hudson Blvd. <br />M/S/PJohnson/Smith—to approve Ro. 2006-064, approving Plans and <br />Specifications for Eagle Point Boulevon passed 4-0) <br />F. Water Tower Pro ect: Verbal Update <br />The City Planner informed Coun that CB & I Co ctors, Inc. informed the City <br />about the water tower being o f-specification/out-of-t ranee by 4 inches. CB & I <br />is osed a remedy and s ution. <br />a Engineer reco nded hiring an independent natio nsultant, Tank <br />rf try Consultants, to valuate the proposals for correction of the deviation. All costs <br />will be covered by C & I, Inc., including TKDA. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/J on — to authorize City Engineer Prew to pursue a contract with <br />Tank Industry Consultants in an estimated amount of $13,000.00, and recover costs by <br />charging CB & I. (Motion passed 4-0) <br />9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: <br />A. Zoning Ordinance Text Interpretation — Accessory Buildings: <br />The City Planner reported that Staff discovered what appeared to be a wording problem <br />within the table of the Zoning Ordinance that prescribes the number and allowable area of <br />accessory structures in the AG zoning district. <br />The City Planner and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Council is that <br />the term "combined" is used where the ordinance described multiple buildings in the Rl, <br />RED and OP section of the table; and, therefore, the lack of that term in the AG district <br />text implied that the stated maximum building area is applicable to each of the two <br />accessory buildings allowed. <br />M/S/P Johnston/Smith — to reschedule consideration until the July 19, 2006, City Council <br />meeting. (Motion passed 4-0) <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 5, 2006 <br />