Laserfiche WebLink
20. Complete the following table, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases wastewater <br />flow from currently planned land use and sewer flow projections. <br />Total Community Flow <br />Pre -Amendment m d <br />Total Community Flow <br />Post Amendment-(m d <br />2000 <br />2.30 * <br />2.30 <br />2010 <br />2.53 <br />2.53 <br />2020 <br />2.68 <br />2.68 <br />2030 <br />2.57 <br />2.57 <br />Mga = million gallons per clay <br />*Based on average of actual 1999, 2000, and 2001 flows. Per discussion on December 15, 2006 with Kyle Colvin. <br />21. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the <br />proposed amendment? <br />Yes, explain: Mains in area are of adequate size to handle the projected flows (both peak and daily <br />n: <br />22. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the <br />proposed amendment? <br />X I Yes, explain: This is a small development within the allocated system statement flows <br />23. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (W) problem? <br />X Yes, describe the steps taken to address the 1/1 issue and plans for future action: See Question 6. <br />No. the Citv/Two does not have an identified 1/1 croblem. <br />24. Identify interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if flows will be diverted from one <br />interceptor service area to another? <br />This change will have a minimal impact on the interceptor and will not require any changes. <br />25. Does the plan amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new <br />intercommunity agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan. <br />enclose a copy of the inter-communit <br />No. <br />February 2006 7 <br />