Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Motion, DeLapp To go forward with investigating this type of plan and appoint Councilmember <br />Smith to participate in any discussions and to keep an eye on this project. FAILED FOR A <br />SECOND. <br />Motion, Conlin To bring this concept to both Parks and Planning Commissions for their opinions <br />prior to any discussions with Oakdale. FAILED FOR A SECOND, <br />Councilmember Smith asked if Oakdale could proceed without us. The Administrator said the <br />City is in charge of the zoning and use for that parcel so Oakdale has to work with Lake Elmo. <br />M/S/P, Smith/Johnston To simultaneously have discussions with Oakdale while we send the <br />proposal to the Parks Commission and Planning Commission for approval recommendations. <br />The Administrator said the City is looking for the foundations of an agreement, not an agreement <br />yet because business questions need to be answered first. <br />VOTE: 3:2 Nay — DeLapp, We should collect some guidelines from the Parks Commission, <br />neighbors around the proposed park, and the Planning Commission. Conlin — The proposal should <br />be presented to the Parks and Planning Commissions first. <br />Councilmember Johnson left the table at 11:48 p.m <br />12. City Council Reports <br />a. Mayor Johnston <br />Mayor Johnston reported he was invited to serve on the Board of Directors for the Regional <br />Mayors' Conference. <br />b. Councilmember Conlin <br />C. Councilmember DeLapp <br />d. Councilmember Johnson <br />e. Councilmember Smith <br />Councilmember Smith said she would like to get moving on Code Enforcement. She said it will <br />become a very important issue soon. <br />Mayor Johnston adjourned the meeting at 1 I :50 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Kimberly Schaffel <br />Recording Secretary <br />Lake Elmo City Council Minutes of January 17, 2006 <br />15 <br />