Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Smith said she was worried about population changes during that last MeDRAFT <br />Council meeting as a result of these remedial measures, and asked Peter Bell about it then. <br />On page E-3, Land Use -Village Plan, the Planner said we did not include a map for that plan <br />because we do not have one yet. <br />The Planner said that Housing is not a Regional System. However, there is a legislative mandate <br />that every community demonstrate how it is going to address its share of Affordable Housing. <br />We currently have a good deal of affordable housing, more than some neighboring cities. The <br />Metropolitan Council wants us to demonstrate how we can do more for the future with not less <br />than 41-46 acres developable at 5-6 units per acre. Densities in some areas must also be <br />demonstrated as sufficient for 100 rental units. <br />Administrator Rafferty said many of these are the same items in the September 26, 2005 letter <br />from the Metropolitan Council, while some are not. The Planner said this is an issue of content <br />not completeness. <br />Councilmembers Johnson, Conlin, and Smith would like to hear the potential solutions and <br />options offered by staff. Councilmember DeLapp would like to table until tomorrow when he <br />has to leave tonight. The Mayor said we could have aanother later meeting but we should give <br />direction to staff tonight on how to proceed. <br />Councilmember Johnson would like to go through the letter item by item. <br />The Planner said he has developed a method for addressing the third remedial measure without <br />overshooting our 2030 population target. The Planner distributed language that could be <br />inserted. There are two land use districts guided for regional sewer, SRD 3.5 and the VR <br />District. He said that rather than modify the map, this language could be inserted into the district <br />descriptions with two provisions for population and no increased density within 1000 feet of an <br />existing residence or 500 feet from an existing residence in the Village. He said if we do this, he <br />thinks the map will not need to be changed. <br />Councilmember DeLapp said those neighborhoods could look like a PUD. The Planner said it <br />would be the City's choice where we would place additional density. Councilmember DeLapp <br />said we will have greater density on one parcel and open space on the next. <br />Councilmember Smith asked if the new text takes place of the sentence inserted at the last <br />meeting. The Planner said this would be in addition to that sentence. Councilmember Smith <br />wants to be sure we are not going over 24000 population and 6600 REC units. The Planner said <br />we have never gotten a response from Metropolitan Council when asking for clarification on that <br />issue. <br />Councilmember DeLapp said the Metropolitan Council is backpedaling on the MOU. <br />Councilmember Conlin said we have to give staff enough time and still get it back in time for <br />Council review. We have to put in the good faith we have in support of and to protect the MOU. <br />Councilmember DeLapp left the table at 6:42 p.m. <br />The City Attorney said the Council can table this meeting to a time and day certain. <br />Lake Elmo City Council Emergency Meeting Minutes of January 24, 2006 <br />