Laserfiche WebLink
(Austad et al Continued from Page 1) <br />In December the property owners submitted a proposed plan for the alternative drain field <br />site and conveyance system to the staff for review. That review resulted in staff concerns <br />with tree loss and resulting visual impact of the alternative drain field site, and concerns <br />by the City Engineer with some of the mechanical features of the conveyance/treatment <br />system proposed. <br />On January 10, 2006 the Council Committee of the Whole considered both the property <br />owners' plan and the staff's concerns with that plan. The petitioning property owners and <br />a least one other property owner that would be adjacent to the new drain field attended <br />the meeting and addressed the Committee. The petitioning property owners presented a <br />letter of endorsement for the project from the other three property owners that reside <br />adjacent to where the new drain field would be located. <br />The petitioning property owners agreed to incorporate modifications to their project <br />design as follows: <br />1. New tree plantings along the north/cast periphery of the new drain field that <br />would provide immediate and effective year-round screening — as recommended <br />by the City Forester as to count, species and as -planted sizing. <br />2. Such design modifications to the conveyance system and drain field as the City <br />Engineer recommends to insure proper system functioning and City maintenance <br />in the future. <br />The property owners will pay for all system components and construction and City <br />construction inspection. The City will become the owner of and be responsible for the <br />portions of the system in Public right-of-way and on City property in the same manner as <br />the 201 systems. The property owners will pay the City the periodic wastewater fee as <br />now paid by 201 system property owners. <br />