My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 21, 2006 CCP
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2006
>
March 21, 2006 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 12:40:31 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:19:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A n fi Y Lj �r� tJl� r4PPROV'ED, 2/13/06 <br />probably fit in with the natural setting in the AG Zone but we have to address these other factors. <br />We have CUP s in the AG zone such as greenhouses, kennels, and stables. We would want <br />conditions established in advance for wedding receptions so everyone knows what to expect. <br />M/S/P, Armstrong/Ptacek to direct staff to come back with a draft ordinance in the next few <br />weeks. <br />The Planner said he will investigate how this use is regulated in Stillwater. He agreed with <br />Commissioner Armstrong about it needing to be a Conditional Use. <br />VOTE: 9:0. <br />Drive-up/Drive-through Facilities for Table Service Restaurants in the GB Zone <br />The Planner introduced the request for a minor site plan modification for a drive -up window at <br />Gorman's Restaurant. The City Code says restaurants with table service are all that are <br />permitted in the GB Zone. Council agreed that clause was designed to preclude fast food <br />restaurants in the City. The Council sustained the administrative decision to deny Mr. Gorman's <br />request but directed that the Planning Commission review the Code to determine if it could be <br />modified to allow a drive -up window without violating the original ordinance intent. The <br />Planner believes it can. Oakdale's ordinance distinguishes fast food from classic restaurants. <br />Order boards differentiate them partly because of lights and attendant noise. <br />Commissioner Van Zandt said Applebee's and Chili's car side to go is a successful model <br />because you would not want to order food and then wait for it. The order must be placed in <br />advance. He said this presents convenience for young parents and elderly people. He thinks <br />there is a need for it in the City as long as it is controlled. <br />The Planner said Oak Park Heights addresses bank drive -up facilities very well. They must have <br />room for stacking of automobiles on -site. There is room at Gorman's but there would not be <br />room at the Lake Elmo Inn or Twin Points. <br />Mr. Gorman said he wants a limited menu board of coffees and ice cream cones. He would face <br />it to the south with a 70 db squawk box. Commissioner Armstrong said that makes it more <br />difficult for the Planning Commission to accommodate the request. <br />Commissioner Armstrong said an intercom and menu board would prohibit it. Commissioner <br />Pelletier is against any kind of intercom, menu board, or drive -up window. She suggested car <br />side to go. Chairman Helwig agreed. Commissioner Lyzenga asked about a walk-up window <br />instead. <br />A Straw Poll was conducted to see which commissioners would be in favor of a menu <br />board/intercom system. 0: menu board/intercom system. Another Straw Poll was conducted for <br />car side to go versus a drive -up window. 5: drive up window without menu or intercom. 9: car <br />side to go. A Straw Poll was taken to determine if the Planning Commission would like to take <br />up this matter. All 9 commissioners agreed. <br />M/S/P, Ptacek/Deziel to direct staff to draft an ordinance allowing window service without a <br />menu board and without an intercom system allowing this type of use of a restaurant in the GB <br />Zone. VOTE: 7:2 Nay - Lyzenga/Pelletier, Lyzenga expressed concern about getting cars to the <br />window in an orderly fashion. Pelletier is worried about a negative precedent. PASSED. <br />Lake Elmo Planning commission Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2006 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.