My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 21, 2006 CCP
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2006
>
March 21, 2006 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 12:40:31 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:19:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M/S/P Smith/Johnston - to direct the staff to take enforcement action against the property <br />owner of 5699 Keats Avenue by requiring all four illegal structures need to be moved to <br />the required 10' side yard setback: the pet containment system, retaining wall, drainage <br />system and manmade berm, the natural drainage pattern needs to be restored and a legal <br />landscape material used in the required side yard setback (sod, seed, mulch and <br />plantings); the removal of the structures and restoration of natural grade along with <br />appropriate landscaping needs to be done from the screening structure on the cast to the <br />end of the retaining wall on the west. The 4" drainage pipe that runs under the driveway <br />and is laying in the required 10' side yard setback needs to be removed and that water <br />needs to be redirected to stay on the Sessing property. (Motion passed 5-0.) <br />Attorney Filla also noted that the property owner had been instructed to install gutters and <br />change the drainage so that it goes across the driveway to the southeast. As of now, the <br />property owner has not done as directed. The Council said they would take a wait and <br />see what happens on this. <br />Joan Ziertman said it had been discussed at a previous Council workshop and she would <br />like to know what the legal bearing would be that the inspector interpreted the code for <br />23 years that you cannot have more garage space than the size of the principal building. <br />She felt this needed further discussion. Mayor Johnston responded that the City Attorney <br />has interpreted the code, that there is no legal basis, and the City has to fix this section of <br />the code. <br />11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />A. Snowmobile Ordinance; Ordinance No 97-164 <br />The Administrator explained he had a visit from the homeowner and the snowmobile <br />problem has not been eliminated. The City has to have this ordinance in place in order to <br />be enforced by the Deputies and recommended passing the ordinance. <br />Valdi Stefenson, representing two organizations the Stillwater Snow Lords and Star Trail, <br />said they were in opposition to adopting this ordinance as this would be bad public policy <br />to make a revision upon one single complaint. This ordinance will negatively impact <br />other residents and is much stricter than state or county regulations. He said it was his <br />understanding that the problem with the affected homeowner was resolved by moving the <br />trail. <br />M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to adopt Ordinance No. 97-164, A Snowmobile Ordinance. <br />As presented. (Motion passed 3-2: Conlin, Johnson). <br />Council member Conlin voiced her concern that in her neighborhood a snowmobile could <br />be within 50' of a residential dwelling not owned by the operator and still be on her <br />property because her lot is only 95' wide. <br />Attorney Filla said this is a common problem and asked where you draw the line. I Ie said <br />it's difficult to craft an ordinance to fit all neighborhoods. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.