Laserfiche WebLink
D. CDBG A lication• Resolution No, 2005-139 <br />The City Planner reported Washington County is soliciting 20006 CDBG applications <br />fiom communities. To date the City has received CDBG contract obligations totaling <br />$120,000 for the Cimarron Gas Service Replacement Program. He <br />underway, with eligibility interview complete for the initial block said id that ro homesr and out <br />of that group, 62 homeowners have been interviewed and as many as 54 will be eligible <br />for grant assistance. Work will commence on those homes in early 2006. <br />The Planner explained depending on the work, it appears that the $120outcome of the re -solicitation of bids for the <br />work on well under 1,000 now under contract will be sufficient to complete the <br />00 homes. He suggested the Council consider again applying for <br />CDBG funding to both inspect the balance of the CDBG units and to provide further <br />grant funds for additional eligible home owners from the Phase 1 <br />that results from the additional inspections. A suggested $g0 6up and the group <br />2006 CDBG program.rs applied for from the <br />M/S/P Johnston/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. <br />the City's 2006 CDBG application. (Motion nac.ve <br />Member�on verbal <br />With the variety of meetings we <br />many times they talk about situt <br />or not done, and sometimes c <br />Performance rather than genes 'T <br />employees are entitled to a.perfoi <br />over the line, the riLhts <br />B. Undat on Close <br />Attorney Filla repo tf, pn the <br />Sessing lawsuit, things' <br />that the Council thought s�iOtij <br />A Resolution Approving <br />111vil oer Johnson voiced her concern that <br />he Crfy and try to identify what has been done <br />t.latiir personnel laws in questioning staff <br />rttorntrpFilla explained from a legal standpoint <br />evaluation at a non public setting. If you step <br />are not being upheld. <br />r14dased meeting where he met and talked about issues in the <br />expanded in the <br />be di lawsuit and things that came up <br />be discuss at a public meeting such as: <br />(1) Size of Garage to Residential Dwelling <br />(2) Allowed Uses for Side Yard Setback <br />(Please refer to the December 5, 2005 letter from Jerry <br />minutes, for his review on these sections of the code.) <br />Filla, which is made part of these <br />Size of Gara e to Residential Dwellin : <br />Attorney Filla summarized the information he stated in his letter dated December 5, <br />he c e also stated that based on information he has shared in the past, terminology in <br />the code book is inconsistent or not clearly defined in regards to accessory building, <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 <br />