Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Johnson asked if you could add, "provided no economic downturn." The <br />Planner said it is within the Comprehensive Plan already. Councilmember Johnson said we <br />should reemphasize it in this portion of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Planner said that Aviation, the Village Plan, and Housing can be addressed at once with the <br />Village Land Use portion of the text. Metropolitan Council wants more detail and the Village <br />Plan Map. The Planner suggested going to Mr. Engstrom's concept stage plan and converting it <br />into a Village Plan Map as of today. He said that may not be the final end product. He suggests <br />implementation devices be addressed in the Land Use Plan text. An overlay district in the <br />Village that says the Comprehensive Plan is the zoning for that area of the City. That will be <br />form -based zoning. The Plan will show a green belt and someone will suggest the City is taking <br />but we will be doing Transfers of Development Rights, and those owners will be compensated <br />for their development densities. The Planner asked the Village Consultants to do that map and <br />calculate the numbers. That map is what we will insert, subject to implementation measures. <br />That addresses the housing issues, aviation - because safety zones will b'e on that Land Use Plan <br />as a green belt. The property owner has development rights to sell � e have discussed this <br />Village Plan for three years. The concept by the planner representmge landowners is very <br />similar to what we anticipate in our Village Plan. We have ruri out of timeYto trade plans, we <br />must keep the option open for modifications later but we have to submit something to the <br />Metropolitan Council by February 1, 2006. <br />The Mayor said how are we assured there will be no surprises on February 1? The last page of <br />Peter Bell's letter invites the Mayor to call himyor Blair Tremer•= The Mayor will call either of <br />ter; .., <br />them if the Planner does not get a response. The �+orce message received by the Mayor had the <br />tone that this was important to the Metropolitan C'tunol as well. <br />Councilmember Conlin said she hopes staffis thoroughly documenting our attempts to work <br />with them, and staff should document phone calls took <br />The Mayor said we have also been tl)& `4tened with lawsuits. There are legal issues and sensitive <br />E <br />issues that create the a, ssity for a closed session tonight. <br />Administrator Rafferty "suggested thetouncil set a time certain for tabling the open meeting. <br />Jot, <br />Councilmember Conlin asked if zsiaff feels comfortable with direction offered thus far. <br />The City Attorney said that direction should be made on the record. <br />M/S/P, Conlin/Johnson, to implement our discussion as direction to staff to work with Met <br />Council staff to be sure on February 1, 2006 that Metropolitan Council has everything they need. <br />VOTE: 4:0. <br />The Council set the continuation of this meeting for 5:30 p.m., Friday, January 27, 2006, and we <br />might have solutions by then with regard to the Village Plan, Councilmember Johnson said that <br />anything staff can accomplish by then should be brought to that meeting. <br />Mark Putman spoke on behalf of Mr. Lynskey and representing the allied owners. He asked if <br />the actions proposed tonight were negotiable. He asked if the concept for the Village Plan <br />Lake Elmo City Council Emergency Meeting Minutes of January 24, 2006 <br />