My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 16, 2006 CCP
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2006
>
May 16, 2006 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 1:11:35 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:19:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A. Variance for 8009 Hill Trail Jason Tacheny: Resolution 2006-041: <br />The City Planner reported that the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and adopted a <br />recommendation for approval of this application to remodel and enlarge an existing home on a <br />substandard lot (by area). Two variances are requested and recommended for approval: home <br />enlargement on substandard lot and street setback to Hill Trail. <br />Council discussion concerned the setting of a potential precedent, the character of the neighborhood, if <br />the scale of the house after the improvements would be in keeping with the neighborhood; and, the <br />nature of the hardship. <br />City Attorney Filla stated that State Law prescribes, "reasonable use of the property" among the general <br />standards for granting zoning variances. He also advised the Council that each variance application is <br />unique and the Council's decisions on variances tend to be subjective, and need not necessarily be <br />consistent as long as specific findings are made by the Council regarding the variance standards in each <br />case. He concluded that the Council should not be concerned with precedent as long as there are <br />specific findings to support their variance decisions. <br />M/S/P Johnston/Johnson — to table to the next meeting to continue consideration of the applications with <br />the full Council in attendance. <br />(Motion passed 3-1: DeLapp-believed everything was presented) <br />DRAFT DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.