May 2, 2006 CCP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

concerns about the health, safety and welfare if the septic system were to fail. They are requesting more than a 60' setback. City Planner Dillerud and City Attorney Filla stated that trails are not structures and, therefore, may be located within the OP buffer area. The City Planner also suggested that the trail could easily be moved, and he thought the developer would agree to that. Ms. Ziertman said she would like to know how the size of the proposed septic treatment wetland compared to the Fields I development. The City Engineer said that he will provide that information to them. Paul Danielson, the Developer's engineer, confirmed that the alternatelbackup drainfield site is north of the church and is a constructed wetland. Ms. Ziertman stated that she would like to see screening provided%6 their property line, buffering them the project. City Planner Dillerud stated the Final Landscape Plan would be submitted later along with the Final Plat. Ms. Ziertman asked why the trail couldn't be put on\eysecond drainfield, site and to the east site line, within thel5'-20' watermain easement grante , , o the City l y the developer. Mr. Danielson agreed that language could be adding atra�ght to the watermain easement _. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to adopt Resolution 2006-03,& approving the OP Development Stage Plan/OP Conditional Use Permit and Pxehmirl Plat for Hidden Meadows of Lake Elmo per plans staff dated Aprt3, 2006, with the addition of the following: 1) Compliance with the recommendati& s/requirements of the City Engineer; 2) Compliance with the reco-mendat arisfrequirements of the Valley Branch Watershed District as found to be appropriibI1y,,the City Engineer; 3) Trail setback to the Ziertman property be increased.# reenitg be considered in the Landscape Plan; 4) Confirm drainfield setback 15yd be 100'_eett'rom property line; 5) Provide size and delineation of the alternate drairfield; 6) Secondary drainfield have the appropriate easement for trail use; 7) A trail easement be added to the proposed watermain easement. (Motion passed 5-0) C. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment — Outdoor Social rvents: Several Council Members questioned the need to reduce the maximum person count and the need for additional required conditions regarding traffic, parking, hours, and liquor. City Planner Dillerud recommended referring the proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission to further consider those matters. He noted that some of those concerns were best addressed case -by -case with a formal CUP application, and that this was a City-wide ordinance under consideration, not a specific applications by a property owner. Resident Carol Palmquist stated that she wanted to clarify the number of people and vehicles that would be allowed. She said her staff would control loud music, security and safety, and that two hundred people or less would be attending events on her property. 0 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2006