Laserfiche WebLink
Joan Ziertman asked what type of park we are going to have and agreed that the City was <br />putting the cart before the horse. She said the City should decide if we want a park there. <br />She voiced her concern on the amount of money paid for a park for Oakdale residents and <br />maybe we should think about where we would want parks for our residents. These items <br />should be discussed before we enter into an agreement. <br />Bob Helwig, Planning Commission Chair, stated that this proposal is the tail wagging the <br />dog. The City does need ball fields, but let us get the right land. He suggested looking in <br />the Old Village Area plan to place 4-5 new fields. He noted that the site proposed is <br />sizable, and would support many houses toward the mandated 2030 population of 24,000. <br />Council member Smith said there would be 12 houses on the 26 acres of the proposed <br />site. <br />Council member Conlin said she observed that 3M owns the land in Oakdale, and they <br />could give land to Oakdale for the playfield instead of Lake Elmo land. She said that the <br />Oakdale Athletic Association is a powerful force and will dictate what they want in a <br />joint playfield, including lighted fields. She said she views this to be primarily an <br />Oakdale park for its ballfields. <br />Terry Arrons asked why this Lake Elmo land was being donated when 3M has so much <br />other land in Oakdale. He asked why the City can't update the existing parks we have <br />now. <br />Mayor Johnston said you better decide what you need, define it and work it down; and <br />that it would be an error to rush to judgment on the proposal without the benefit of a Lake <br />Elmo needs analysis. He said the City should restart the process regarding the playfield <br />proposal. <br />Council member Johnson said she doesn't quarrel with the high need for fields, but feels <br />the City should do a need assessment, and then decide where we are going to place multi- <br />use fields. She observed that if the City can't meet our playfield needs now, what we are <br />going to do when we are 24,000 population. <br />The Administrator said that this needs to go back to the parks commission to determine <br />the need for playfields, and where would they be. <br />Council member Smith pointed out the Parks Dept. talked about a possible skating <br />rink/winter activity in the Sunfish Park area and asked what about the 20 acres in front of <br />Sunfish Park to use as temporary fields. <br />Planner Dillerud said he has provided the Parks Commission a needs assessment done by <br />Oakdale that could act as a process guide for the Lake Elmo Park Plan update. He noted <br />that you don't do an updated park plan before you do a land use plan. Now that the 2030 <br />land use plan is all but completed, the Parks Commission is on their way with the Park <br />Plan update —including community playfields. In response suggestion that the <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 14, 2006 <br />