My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
September 14, 2006 CCP
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2006
>
September 14, 2006 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2025 11:18:56 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:19:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCVACFC Site Selection Task Force August 18, 2006 <br />Page 16 <br />Weaknesses <br />Moderately high cost of Site ($4.50 per square foot) <br />May also be additional assessments for utilities and infrastructure; <br />Future planned interchange at Manning Avenue and TH 36 may create future access difficulties <br />and may significantly reduce convenient access to the Site. <br />Portions of the sites may have some environmental issues because storage and dumping has <br />occurred in the past; no EAW or EIS has been completed to date. <br />Topography is generally flat with some tree cover. <br />Rezoning would be required and according to City, would be rezoned for residential use. <br />Other Sites <br />Other sites in the area were explored, but are: <br />1) too small in size; <br />2) current zoning requirements severely constrain the ability to consider the proposed use <br />3) the site is too distant from the current and projected population centers <br />The following section presents a weighting of criteria in order of importance and applies a rating <br />scale to each criteria for each site. The analysis provides a quantitative assessment for each site. <br />Additional qualitative criteria such as political climate is considered, but is not factored into the <br />quantitative assessment. <br />Maxfield Research Inc. also requested information regarding any potential environmental <br />concerns that may be associated with each of the sites. This information is briefly summarized <br />on the tables and in the strengths/weaknesses segment of the analysis. <br />Weighting Criteria <br />Table 3 shows a weighting assessment for each of the proposed sites. The weighting assessment <br />assigns a weight value to each of several criteria. These criteria may be weighted differently <br />based on the discussions of the site selection task force or additional criteria may be added to this <br />analysis. <br />Each of the site criteria is assigned a value rating from 1 through 5 with 1 being nooT and 5 beine <br />excellent. These value ratings are shown on the table along with a total that is derived from the <br />value rating alone. <br />These value ratings are multiplied by the weighting factor to arrive at a weighted total for the <br />criteria which is shown in the highlighted section immediately below the rating for the criteria. <br />MAxFIEY-D RESEARCH INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.