My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-00 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2000
>
02-23-00 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 9:01:54 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:24:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br />FEBRUARY 23, 2000 <br />Mayor Hunt called the workshop to order at 5 p.m. in the Council Chambers to discuss <br />the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Stillwater Investment. PRESENT: Siedow, <br />Dunn (arrived 5:10 p.m.) , Hunt, Armstrong, DeLapp, City Planner Dillerud, City <br />Engineer Prew, City Attorney Filla, and Administrator Kueffner. <br />1. Agenda: The Council amended the agenda to include a request from staff regarding a <br />utility easement in the Fields of St. Croix, 2"a <br />2. Utility Easement over dedicated park land in the Fields of St. Croix, 2"d Addition. <br />Staff advised the Council that through an oversight, the City did not grant a utility <br />easement to the Field's Home Owners Association for access to and maintenance of the <br />wetland treatment system that crosses a portion of a city park within this development. <br />M/S/P DeLaapp/Siedow - to direct the staff to work with the developer of the Fields of <br />St. Croix, 2" Addition to obtain the necessary easement in favor of the Fields's <br />Homeowners's Association for future access, inspection and maintenance of the <br />wetland treatment system that serves this property. <br />3. Stillwater Investment: John Arkell <br />The Council reviewed a fourth land use option submitted by John Arkell on behalf of <br />Stillwater Investment. This option included 109 home sites and approximately 4 acres of <br />commercial property. Mr. Arkell stated that he had visited Bob Engstrom's development <br />in Woodbury that has this type of mixed used, and was willing to consider this type of <br />development if the council approved it. <br />In concept, the majority of the Council favored a mixed -use development with a <br />maximum of 25,000 square feet of "professional office buildings", including the <br />necessary parking lot, along with the 109 single-family home sites. <br />Council member Armstrong stated she could support the commercial site, if the home <br />sites were reduced and the lots we larger. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.