Laserfiche WebLink
Council member DeLapp asked Mr. Deziel if he was representing the <br />Planning Commission or speaking as a Tri-Lakes propertyowner. DeLapp <br />pointed out that State law requires there have to be unique conditions to <br />grant a variance. <br />Planner Dillerud pointed out there was no mistake on the part of the staff to <br />recommend approval of one case and denial of the other. The argument <br />went to issues such as scale of resulting residential unit in terms of average <br />in neighborhood, which was discussed by the Planning Commission. The <br />Planning Commission said approval of the variance was based on the fact <br />the variance request meets the variance standards of the code. We believe <br />there were two distinctly different issues here even though the properties, in <br />terms of the lot, may be comparable. He suggested the City needed to define <br />"reasonable", and staff recommended that the "line" be drawn with the <br />Kiesling scale of lot development. He did receive a FAX from Molly <br />Shodeen, DNR, voicing DNR's opposition to the variance request. <br />Mayor Hunt stated it is the Planner's job to take the shoreland ordinance, <br />interpret it, and make his opinion. If the Council wants to interpret the <br />ordinance differently, they can. If the Council wants him to just lay the facts <br />out, Planner Dillerud said he would be happy to do it. <br />Mr. Deziel responded the Planning Commission determined what is normal <br />and reasonable. We could either have livable modern homes or shacks down <br />by the lake. The Commission was advised it could go forward without <br />findings. In the future, he suggested that the planner not take either side in <br />his staff report. Mayor Hunt stated this could be brought up at the Planning <br />Commission for their input. <br />Molly Shodeen, DNR waters, stated DNR's opposition to issuing this <br />variance. She stated that some of the comments presented are not correct. <br />The DNR did not raise the water level of Lake Jane, mother nature did. <br />There were many homes built in the 50's on lake bed. These houses flooded <br />in the 70's when the water level rose. The DNR established OHW <br />elevations in the mid 70's for Lake Jane. This,home is in the flood plain. In <br />1988 DNR issued a permit to the previous homeowner, to raise the structure. <br />We gave him 15' around the house and allowed him to encroach beyond the <br />OHW level by 2'. Also when the structure was raised he could not put on <br />any decks. That permit was not completed by this propertyowner. The <br />permit was transferred to Mr. Kiesling when he purchased the home with a <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 7 <br />