02-05-02 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

wide convenience, but for lots with existing homes around the lake with faulty septic systems. Council member DeLapp commented that the target audience was not to subsidize new development, but where we might need an incentive to improve an existing situation. Dan Rude asked if the vacant land owned by the City is still available to purchase, as he would want to purchase a lot and add on to his lot to create a 24,000 sq.ft. lot. The staff responded to Mr. Rude that there would not be any sale of city -owned property until a policy for selling city -owned land was developed by the staff, and approved by the Council. M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn — to deny the request by Dan Rude for hookup to the 32" d Street 201 System based on the City Engineer's report dated February 1, 2002, and based on the staff s report dated February 5, 2002. (Motion passed 5-0). The City Administrator will draft a policy for the sale of city -owned property and present it to the City Council for consideration at the March 5th meeting. The City Administrator will also draft a policy for the use of city -owned property for failing septic systems for Council consideration at the March 5d' meeting. C. Eagle Point Business Park — Amendments to Development Agreement City Planner Dillerud reported two issues, as noted in the Request for Council Action Memo, have surfaced that require Council consideration for amendments to the Development Agreement. One issue is to incorporate City payment of Park dedication and Sanitary Sewer assessment (only) on Outlot D. Further, that the street assessment levied on Outlot D be the financial responsibility of the developer; and that there is no amendment to the cost of the bridge improvements and resulting Administrative Fee. Mr. Burkards, United Properties, was sick and asked that the matter be tabled. In his letter dated December 19, 2001, Mr. Burkards asked the City to consider reducing the administrative fee on the two bridges of this project because the box culvert could have been built instead of the arch bridges that have been installed and did not use any additional staff time to review and approve the bridges that we would have for the box culverts. City Engineer Prew responded this is true, but our policy is that we figure our administrative fee by what is designed and built. The Council agreed that the Development Agreement should be as comprehensive as possible and made the following motion. M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn — to approve amendment to the Eagle Point Business Park 2nd Development Agreement to incorporate City payment of Park Dedication and Sanitary LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2002