Laserfiche WebLink
palities or townships and they must then accept the <br />responsibility of maintaining those local access roads. <br />(b) We are concerned with the additional delay entailed <br />if Alternate II is selected. How many accidents will <br />occur along T.H. 12 during this delay? What will be the <br />additional taxpayers cost resulting from this delay? <br />(c) We feel that spending the additional millions of <br />dollars to build Alternate II would be wasteful. Alter- <br />nate II does not lessen adverse impacts for a majority <br />of county residents and may in fact create an adverse <br />impact for more citizens than Alternate I. Therefore, <br />spending the additional money is not justified. <br />IN SUMMARY, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo favors <br />Alternate I on the grounds that Alternate I best follows City, County, <br />and Regional planning, provides for the least disruption to a majority <br />of residents, uses public funds in a most prudent and reasonable manner, <br />and has the least adverse impact on most of the adjacent residents and <br />properties. <br />Passed unanimously by the City Council this 12th day of February, <br />1975; members Eder, Abercrombie, Shervheim, Pott and Lyons voting in <br />favor thereof. <br />LL'(_ <br />�"" ,c � 9,6� <br />Mayn rd L. Eder, Mayor <br />Attest: <br />Donald Mehs' o-Clerk` <br />