Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lake Elmo City Council Meeting, August 15, 1978 cont. <br />Vacation Ridgeway Drive - Tablyn Park: Mr. Gary Carlson 8722 Ironwood Trail, Lake Elmo, <br />Mr. James Kaufhold 8780 Ironwood Trail, Lake Elmo and Mr. Joe Chrulch 8690 <br />Ironwood Trail, Lake Elmo, appeared before the Council with concerns of <br />whether the easement would have to be maintained from the road pouth to the <br />park, whether the easement might be for utilities, whether the easement would <br />run thru Novak's property and whether, as a result of the easement,,the <br />abstracts would have to be updated and who would pay the eypense of same. <br />Council discussed the questions and. other matters concerning the easements. <br />Counsel Raleigh said the plat is probably wrong, He said the platted street <br />in Tablyn Park exists and if the City vacates a street and retains 10 foot <br />easement, the 10 foot easement remains as the easement of the platted street <br />and he does not think that would be changed unless there is a Court Order. <br />The Council stressed that as far as the City is concerned, the total ease- <br />ment is q0 feet. <br />Mayor Armstrong stated that the easement would not be an infringement on the <br />property rights, and would be enlarging the lots. <br />Council instructed Administrator Whittaker to write Engineer Noyes inquiring <br />whether the easement would be for utilities, that, considering the survey <br />may be wrong, whether the easement would 10 feet f0cm lot line in Tablyn <br />Park Second Addition and Tablyn Park First Addition; and should the easement <br />be extended through Novak's property. <br />Counsel Raleigh said that if the City decides to vacate the street, the <br />City's easement should be a condition of the vacation He also suggested <br />that htere has been a request to vacate a street, the City is considering <br />that request, wants to consider 'what City will retain and that maybe a survey <br />should be done, the cost of which should be borne by those who benefit from <br />the vacation. <br />Mayor Armstrong suggested that the neighbors meet to decide whether they want <br />to have their property surveyed in order to determine the exact property <br />Lines. <br />The Council determined that before a decision is made on this issue, Engineer <br />Noyes should make a recommendation to the Council upon his ascertaining the <br />exact location of the easement. <br />Council would like to get this matter on the agenda for the next regular <br />meeting on September 5, 1978. <br />Public Hearing closed at 8:00 p•m, <br />Len Anderson - Eypired Building Permit: Pursuant to the Order of Judge Dablow who heard <br />this case last Wednesday, Mr. Len Anderson appeared before the Council to <br />re -apply for building permit. The Order stated the City could impose any <br />testrictions9 that, in the eventob3r condition stated in the extension is not <br />met or any violation of the permit issued, would result in the Court enjoin- <br />ing the construction activity on the site. <br />The City Building Inspector said that the cost of the extension in one-half <br />the original fee, arid, that a permit lasts for one year, but, if there is no <br />construction, lasts for 180 days. Mr. Anderson's permit ea-pired because of <br />no construction. <br />Mr. Anderson said he has done some work on the inside of the building. <br />