08-07-79 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 7, 1979 -4- Mr. Jim Barton -continued - If such a structure is built prematurely, it creates a premature demand. If the MUSA (- line is indicated along the western border of the City other communities could request.the capacity. This holds true alao if the line is indicated elsewhere, but not used. Councilman Pott indicated that the City would have a better case to retain these units if an area is designated. Mr. Barton indicated that he does not foresee Woodbury or Oakdale needing Lake Elmo's capacity. Councilman Johnson directed to Mr. Levi - In order to complete the Comprehensive Plan, it would be helpful to know of 3M's time table and plan for the 10 year planning period. Mr Levi stated the Maplewood site is adequate to 1985. 3M has not chucked the Carlton Park idea; and they don't want to repeat the work they have already done. Johnson questioned whether they could realistically use plans that are 10 years old. Mr. Levi indicated the PUD and land usage aspect can be used. Councilman Mottaz noted 3M has never requested a rezoning of this property. 3M stopped the process just before a rezoning request. Mottaz does not see how the GRU designation is harmful to 3M. Mr. Barton indicated that if Carlton Park is not abown on the Comprehensive Plan the City will have to go through the process of revising < its plan. Councilman Pott indicated the the previous Comp Plan was changed to accomodate Carlton Park: Mayor Armstrong closed the hearing on the Comprehensive Plan at 8:35 p.m. Councilman Pott desires some planning beyond 1990, in the Comprehensive Plan. The Council will discuss the proposed plan at the next regular meeting. BREAK ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Flood Damage Quotes - Four local contractors were contacted to Submit bids to repair a bituminous flume and roadway ditches in the Lake Jane area. One quote was '*Correction - received. T. A. Schifisky bid*1$2;275. The Engineer A. Schiflky bid recommended the City accept this bid. Federal funding has 62,575. 9/4/79 been secured for the project. Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to accept the bid of T. A. Schifsky for $2,275 for repair of the flume and resodding of the ditches. Motion carried 5-0. B. Schwartz Culvert - The Engineer said the water on eithT eF de of the culvert is the same, indicating the culvert is working. He also reviewed the drainage area and compared it on the USGA map. He could find no natural drainage area from the north. The culvert problems may be caused by it being too short, too low, or the fact the culvert is covered by fill. C. Curb - 1st Street - The resident at 8015 1st Street questioned then d tion of the curb in front of his residence.