Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 -4- <br />MEYER/SCHUBER: Armstrong moved, seconded by Johnson, to approve the <br />large lot subdivision for Meyer/Schubert Land Sale, subject <br />to receipt of a survey of the final two resulting parcels. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br />C. Jim Schultz, 8211 DeMontreville Trail N. - Shoreland Perm <br />Mr. Schultz wants to add to his garage. The roof line will b <br />extended 12 ft. for the addition. The garage is 24 ft. above <br />the water level at floor level. This request meets all the <br />City Ordinances and setbacks. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Pott, to approve the garage addition <br />for Jim Schultz. Motion carried 4-0. <br />D. Mrs. Don Erickson, 8224 Hidden Bay Trail - Shoreland Permit. <br />The Ericksons want to wild a garage at the end of their driveway <br />The backside of the garage would be dug into the hill with boat <br />storage underneath. This request meets all the City Ordinances <br />and setbacks. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Armstrong, to approve the garage permit <br />for Don Erickson. Motion carried 4-0. <br />A. Hardy Driveway - <br />The Engineer reviewed a survey showing the Hardy property and <br />the City's two parcels. There is a 16 1/2 ' strip of land <br />between those parcels and remaining property. It appears to <br />be the remains of an old road bed. The bridge foundation is <br />not on the Hardy or City property; but is on a triangular piece <br />of unclear ownership. The tax records show Lowell -Reid -as-- - <br />owner, ut he indicated he does not have a deed nor does he pay <br />taxes on it. It may be tax forfeit. At one time, he granted <br />easement rights to the ,previous owners of the Hardy property <br />for access to the property. A title search may be necessary. <br />The County is in the process of purchasing this parcel and <br />they may be willing to grant an easement to the Hardy's. Bohrer <br />had two bids for the driveway: Pete Miller Excavating, $5,250; <br />and Carl Olinger, $5,116.06. Bids were high because 500 additional <br />yards of fill will be needed and the work will take more than <br />two days. They will also remove and dispose of the 4' diameter <br />culvert. Pott asked what the City will get out of this work. The <br />intent was to clear the channel, and reduce flooding upstream. <br />The original plan was to remove two small culverts and put in <br />oversized ones for $11,000. This driveway was considered a less <br />costly alternative. The cost could have been cut had material <br />on site been used and the National Guard done the work. The <br />Engineer indicated that since there is more than 11 ft. difference <br />in elevation in some places all the fill material could not comma <br />from the site. <br />Armstrong moved, seconded by Johnson, to accept the .low bid, <br />Carl Olinger, and begin work on the improvement. Discussion - <br />Morgan questioned the possibility of compromising the height of <br />of the driveway to half of what Hardy's desire in order to keep <br />the cost to the City more reasonible. <br />