09-18-79 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 WATER BILLS: Johnson suggested the Administrator inform the people when he calls, that if arrangements for payment have not been made by the second of October the Council requests they come in at 6:30 ( October 2 for an informal discussion with the Council, Morgan, Pott, and Whittaker will be present. ZONING ORDINANCE: The following changes and recommendations were reviewed by the Council: I. Hutchinson — North of the tracks is proposed LI post 1990. The RR zoning on the map is consistant with the philosophy of demand zoning. Rezoning will be reviewed when a plan comes in. 2. Hedges —Sovereign — Property of George Hedges, Ken Sovereign and Brian Crombie will be designated R-1, their ultimate use on the Comp Plan. These parcels are surrounded by R-1, but are undeveloped. 3. Dayton Hudson — Unless the Council chooses to change the Comp Plan, this property must remain RR. It is desirable to encourage cluster development. A PUD is always an option. To zone this property R-1 now is premature since it is at least a mile away from other residential areas and all City services. Goose Lake — The City sees no reason to change the classification of Goose Lake from natural enviroment to recreational development at this time. No plan is before the City showing a different kind of use for the property. It is up to the City to request reclassification. Reclassification would change the setback from the lake and minimum lot size requirements. Daytona felt the two acre lot size, required around a natural enviroment lake, on top of the RR zoning is a burden. The Council decided to leave the designation as is until there is a plan for development. 6. Halliday Property — The Council decided to maintain the GB zoning of the triangular parcel owned by Ward Halliday. 7. Platting all land in the 7/40A zones will be required. 8. Gonyea — Council sees no reason to change the policy on present use zoning. When a plan is brought in the Council will review it for requested use. This area is planned for business use, but is not being used as such. 9. Cimarron — 2 problems — liquor, establishment should be in a Commercial zone, but is not; and the other uses are of a Neighbor— hood Commercial nature, which requires a Special Use Permit in the Mobile Home District. The Club House, laundromat and golf shop could be in the SUP; but the bar and sales are commercial GB. Alternatives: 1. The 'bar' could be zoned commercial when the property on the corner is sold for commercial. Cimarron is in the process of negotiation now. .2. The City could take the risk and zone it all commercial now. In order to resuue the liquor license, the property the liquor store is on would have to be surveyed and zoned Commercial or the whole corner would have to be rezoned. Mr. Taylor stated they bought Comarron as a Mobile Home Park with a corner clas— sified commercial; and are dealing with potential buyers for the corner with that understanding. He requested the Council give them time to complete their negotiation. They would present a more comprehensive plan of what can and will be done commercially on the property, at that time. Armstrong still feels present use should be maintained until a request for rezoning comes before the Council. He suggested rezoning the Club House and the Sales Lot Commercial. The remaining property would remain present use. The Council decided to pass on this issue until Cimarron comes in with plans.