01-02-80 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES, LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Janaury 2, 1980....... page one Mayor Armstrong convened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. with the following Councillors answering the roll Morgan, Mottaz, and Pott. AGENDA:. Armstrong moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve the Agenda with the following corrections: add consideration of the Building Inspector°s offer from Lino Lakes and the League of Minnesota Cities Health Insurance plan to the end of the Agenda. Motion carried 4-0. CLAIMS: Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz to approve claim numbers 79879 through 79921. Motion carried 4-0. COUNCIL_VACANCY: The Council discussed the vacant Council position with Carol Jeanne Novak? Chairman of the Planning Commission. They briefly dis- cussed her role in development of the Comp. Plan and new Ordinances, her opinion on the provisions for keeping horses, and her interest in the City and the vacancy. (William Wacker was interviewed later in the meeting.) SHORELAND PERMIT, CHARLES E. SURFACE: After assurances that the fill permit requested would not impinge on the flood plain nor cause any additional flooding, Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to grant a Shoreland Permit to Mr. Surface to place up to 26 yards of clean fill on his property at 8142 Hidden Bay Trail, subject to approval from the Valley Branch Watershed District. Motion carried 4-0. FOXFIRE GATE AND MONUMENTS: The Council agreed that T.A. Schifsky & Sons, developer of Foxfire, should construct a post and cable barrier on both sides of the gate at the south end of Jamaca; and that the stone monuments should be removed from the north end of Foxfire, as they are on City right-of-way. The Council will review the situation until the next Council meeting; and offer Mr. Schifsky an opportunity to speak to the Council at that time. PUBLIC HEARING on the VACATION OF EAST AND NORTH SHORE LANES in Lanes Demontreville County Club Addition: Mayor Armstrong opened the hearing at 8:03 p.m.; and there was no public testimony. Attorneys for the Michaels, the peti- tioners, were present. Whittaker explained that the easterly part of East Shore Lane was supposed to have been vacated in 1969; but, because of an error in the legal description, it was not. North Shore Lane had been partially vacated at that time. Now, the petitioners and the City seek to vacate the balance of these two Lanes. Pott moved, seconded by Morgan, that the Council adopt RESOLUTION 80-4, A RESOLUTION VACATING EAST SHORE LANE, reserving the City's rights to a drainage easement deeeded separately from the original plat. Motion carried 4-0. Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, that the Council. adopt RESOLUTION 80-5, A RESOLUTION VACATING NORTH SHORE LANE IN ITS ENTIRETY. Motion carried 4-0. The Mayor closed the public hearing having no further testimony.