My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-05-80 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1980
>
11-05-80 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2025 6:32:33 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 4:04:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 5, 1980 -6- <br />OLD BUSINESS: D. Auditors Contract - The Council reviewed the <br />new contract Yrom Moen andPenttila. Bob Voto raised <br />some concerns on what was included in the Moen,Penttila <br />bid vs Vote, Delahunt bid. The Administrator outlined what <br />Moen and Penttlla will provide and said this bid was a <br />competitive acceptable bid. He sent Voto a copy of the <br />Moen, Penttila contract and will contact them personally. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve the Auditor's <br />Contract of Moen & Penttila. Motion tarred 5-0. <br />E. Firemen's Comp. Plan - The Council reviewed the final <br />draft of t e —Firemen's Compensation Plan. This has been <br />formally accepted by the Firemen. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to formally adopt the <br />Firemen's Compensation Plan. Discussion: Pott felt the <br />wording in Qualifications should be clarified to indicate <br />a fireman must be qualified for the Relief Association <br />in order to qualify for the $50 bonus only. The.compen- <br />sation for calls will go to all Firemen whether in the <br />Relief Association or not. Motion to include a change <br />in the wording under Qualifications to read: Each person <br />must be qualified for the Lake Elmo Relief Association <br />for $50 bonus per man only. All participating firemen <br />will receive all compensation. Motion carried 5-0. <br />F. 5 Year Plan for the Parks - The Administrator re- <br />commen e that the Council consider completing now, <br />projects that will serve existing improvements rather <br />than wait and spread it over a five year period, since <br />the money is available today to complete the proposed <br />projects in the plan. Those improvements that are not <br />needed at this time would stay within the 5 year plan <br />even though the money is available. Morgan said most <br />of the proposals are not needed at this time, therefore, <br />the scheduling over a 5 year.period. He reviewed each <br />of the proposals for the'.Council and they agreed the <br />proposed plan should be followed. <br />Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to adopt the 5 year <br />Capital Plan as outlined by the Park Commission. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br />KENNETH GATZKE: The Council reviewed the memo from Bruce Rosenau, <br />Building Inspector, on Mr. Gatzke's permit. Mr. Gatzke <br />needs a shoreland permit to build a garage within 1,000 <br />feet of a shoreland. The structure meets all other re- <br />quirements of the ordinance. The Building Inspector re- <br />commends approving the application. The Engineer is sat- <br />isfied, but recommends the elevations of the structure <br />should be indicated on the lot map before the foundation <br />is laid for the building. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Pott, to approve a Shoreland <br />Permit for Kenneth Gatzke, 8415 Deer Pond Trail, subject <br />to compliance with the Engineer's recommendation. Also <br />the sod should be restored after construction. Motion <br />carried 5-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.