My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-81 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1981
>
03-17-81 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:42:51 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 4:08:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -5- <br />Engineer Bohrer said this is not the current proposal. <br />Dr. Lundholm asked what the City's long range planning is , and <br />if the line is extended further, will the per foot cost be lower. <br />Engineer Bohrer said the cost would not be lower at this time. <br />If this extension were included in a larger project, then, the <br />unit cost would most likely go down; but both projects would have <br />to be done at the same time. He noted that the City has not <br />defined what the ultimate service area will be in this area. <br />Mayor Eder said that before the City defines the ultimate <br />service area it needs to know where &,second well should be <br />located. <br />Councillor Mottaz noted that a study of a total service area <br />would be very costly, and to date, the City has not budgeted <br />for such a study. <br />Mr. Goeress said the project, as proposed, is too expensive and <br />not feasible at this time. The other residents agreed. <br />Mrs. Lundholm asked if the lot size requirement would change <br />if water became available. <br />Mayor Eder said no. <br />Mayor Eder closed the hearing at 8:45 p.m. <br />Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to terminate the project for <br />the watermain extension,,on the recommendation of the property <br />owners, who determined the cost is prohibitive as determined <br />in the Feasibility Study. Motion carried 4-0-1 Novak abstained. <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />A. 201 Study Hearing - <br />Novak moved, seconded by Morgan, to set a public hearing on <br />the 201 Study, on April 28, 1981, at 7 P.M., at Oakland Jr. High. <br />Discussion: Eder asked the Administrator to check on the <br />availability of Lake Elmo Elementary fot the hearing. The <br />Council agreed to hold the hearing at Lake Elmo Elementary <br />if it is available. Motion carried 5-0. <br />B. Erosion Control Project - Regional Park - The report is not <br />yet complete. <br />C. Jamaca Gate - The Administrator requested Council authorization <br />to spend up to $1200 for materials to replace the Jamaca Gate. <br />The City maintenance crew will build the gate. <br />r Engineer Bohrer reviewed the background of the gate. Fraser <br />recommended that the Council make a determination on whether <br />.Jamaca should be permanently opened or closed. She :Felt another <br />gate would only be vandalizes: again. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.