Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -8- <br />FITZENBERGER VARIANCE - 5429 Highlands Trail N.: <br />Mr. Fitzenberger is requesting a 6' variance from the 10' <br />side yard lot.;,line requirement. Presently, his home is 4' <br />from the side lot line. The Council must determine if there <br />is a hardship or if there is a healt4 safety, or welefare problem. <br />Administrator Whittaker said Mr. Fitzenberger has two alternatives: <br />1. move the house, which is not an economical alternative or <br />2. purchase property from the adjacent property owner. He <br />stated the setback is required so that an emergency vehicle <br />can drive through a 10'wide area. The 10' on each lot provides <br />a cushion area. <br />Mayor Eder asked the impact of the variance on the drainage and <br />utility easement along the side lot. He noted the house is on <br />this easement according to the survey. <br />Ernest Cutting, attorney, said that the restrictions on this <br />property indicate that there will be easement shown on the <br />recorded plat; but the plat does not show any easements on the <br />lot line in question. The Fitzenberger's Certificate of Survey in- <br />cludes drainage and utility easements. The Council reviewed the <br />final plat and verified that these easements are not shown. <br />Bruce Folz concurred,.and said the drainage and utility easements <br />should not be included on the Fitzenberger certificate. <br />Mr. Cutting explained that Mr. Fitzenberger was shown the wrong <br />stakes when he purchased the lot; but that the house does not <br />encroach onto the next lot. After the house was complete it <br />was discovered that it.=was 6' too close to the side lot line. <br />Mr. Bob Sneen, owner of adjacdnt.lot la, said this problem could <br />have been avoided if Fitzenberger had surveyed his lot before <br />building his house; and stated the location of the Fitzenberger <br />house adversely affects his property. Potential buyers of his <br />lot will close,provided they can receive some financial compensation <br />for the loss of value on the property. Mr. Sneen stated he <br />had tried to negotiate with Mr. Fitzenberger until he 'gFitzenberger) <br />decided to apply for a variance. Mr. Sneen requested that the <br />Council deny the variance until he has resolved the problem with <br />Mr. Fitzenberger. He is willing to sell 8800 sq. ft. to Mr. <br />Fitzenberger. He is sure this will leave adequate area on his <br />lot for a septic and well. <br />Mottaz said a similar problem exists across the street; and the <br />City 's position is- to have the adjacent property owners <br />resolve the problem between themselves. He recommended the <br />Council take the same positon in this case. <br />Mr. Fitzenberger said that when he bought the lot, his realtor <br />called the developer's salesman and asked that he identify the <br />corner stakes. The salesman identified 3 of the four corners, <br />and sa d..the:.back corner was in line with the front stake. <br />Because of the angle of the lots, Mr. Fitzenberger measured to <br />the wrong back stake. fie also said lie needed to keep the house <br />to the east side of the lot because of a driveway on the west <br />side of his house. <br />