My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-30-81 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1981
>
06-30-81 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:42:51 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 4:08:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-H- <br />Ron Dane - Asked if anything could be done to avoid removing so many trees <br />along^ the Crocker and Raleigh property, Possibly putting up a <br />barrier rather than graduating the slope, <br />Engineer Bohrer.- Talked to the State about constructing a barricade rather than <br />the slope and they indicated this is not an alternative to a safe <br />slope, The only alternative would be to move the road to the west. <br />Steve Raleigh <br />- Asked if the traffic count was measured with or without the Foxfire <br />gate open. He feels if the gate is closed the traffic will double <br />on Yeats. <br />Bhgineer Bohrer- Said, three different traffic counts have been taken from 1978 to 819 <br />before the Foxfire development was there, and all the counts are <br />about the same. <br />Don Moris <br />- Stated the readings should indicate a notic able change due to <br />all the building in the area during the past three years. <br />Mel Eder <br />- Since the road is used for public purposes, why not use public <br />4890 beats <br />funds for its construction. Why should just the people who live <br />on -the road. make up the difference. <br />Jim Blackford <br />- The problemlis,,the coud indicates 200 cars although there are not <br />200 residences, Many people using the road will not pay for <br />it. Landowners are paying for a road utilized by others. <br />L, Whittaker <br />- Responded to this remarko. stating the State of Minnesota will pay <br />for approximately 80"/0 of the road, if this were a City street <br />residents would pay 90% to 100% rather than 201yo, The public is <br />sharing in the cost, <br />Engineer Bohrer- Said the general basis for this improvement is maintenance. Gravel <br />roads are much more costly to maintain. The City adopted a policy <br />to upgrade gravel roads as money became available or the need <br />required upgrading. <br />Mary Slawson <br />- Has a wildlife pond they dug next to the road. Questioned if this <br />can be taken because of the road. This was done by and through the <br />DER following their standards and requirements. <br />Mayor Eder <br />- Said this will be a consideration, <br />Steve Raleigh <br />- Asked about the agricultural fencing being moved. The Engineer <br />noted it will have to be moved back 27 ft. The cost of this <br />has been figured into the project. <br />Dave Storholm <br />- Opposes the project. <br />Catherine Crocker- Lives close to the road. Ilas favored the project; but is concerned <br />about the location. Iithe road is not built futher to the west <br />.;they stand to loose their front yard,j.f built as proposed. <br />Doris Buberl - When she built her house five years ago asked about any plans <br />5545 I{eats to move the road. At that time she was told no, consequently <br />if built as proposed will be in her front yard. <br />Mayor Eder - Explained that if the road is built in place there should not be <br />much difference than as the road exists today. <br />Doris Buberl - Opposes the project, Many cars going by her home now; once black - <br />topped concerned that the road wi.].1 become a race track. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.