07-06-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 6, 1982 -5- B. Flea -Market - Continued Whittaker reported that he talked to the deputies and they thought r the theatre owner, Mr. O'Neil, would require that a deputy be on duty during hours of operation. Mottaz - a deputy should be a requirement of the permit. Also, the permit should provide that if a safety problem develops, because of this operation, along the highway, a traffic control person will be required as a part of the permit. --Eder - number of vendors to be set at 100 - the permit holder is to notify the City when this maximum number is reached. M/S/P Mottaz/Morgan to adopt R-82-39, a Resolution approving a CUP to operate an open sales lot to run a Flea Market at the Vali-Hi Drive -In for the St. Croix Rivermen with the following conditions: 1. Season of Operation - March to October - same as the Drive -In 2. Days of Operation - Sundays only 3. Hours of Operation - 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. 4. Signing - on the theatre marquee only 5. The Casty reserves the right to require a- licensed -police officer should it be determined there is'a traffic safety problem along Highway 12 caused by the Flea :Market.- 6. A maximum of 100 vendors 7. This is an annual permit, reviewed yearly by the City Council Violation of any of the above conditions can result in termination of the permit. Motion carried 4-0. C. Neudahl Large Lot Subdivision - The Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation to approve a large lot subdivision for Kenneth Neudahl. Whittaker advised the Council of the City Attorney's opinion regarding the combined ownership of Parcel B. A Development Agreement could be recorded that states that this is one parcel. Each:cif the fee owners would have to sign the agreement. Should Neudahls default on one of the contracts the non -fee held property in Parcel B would not be buildable until rezoned and subdivided. --Eder - as all surrounding property is R-1 there should be an over-all plan showing how the property would be developed as R-1,, so that whatever is done now, 2 acres or 10 acres, fits the R-1 plan. -- Dennis Peck, Votel Development, working with Bruce Folz - the 2 acre site is in accordance with the over-all development plan,for the 34 acre parcel. Problem is that the property is under three contracts except for a 2 acre parcel.,that they hold title to. Presently, just trying to give the Neudahl's a homestead as they are living in the old farm house on Parcel A. The proposed site was selected because it is high ground and will not have any detrimental effect on the over-all storm water management in the area. An over-all sketch plan can be submitted; but because of the cost and time element for rezoning and developing a detailed subdivision, the Neudahl's feel this request is-the'simpliest way to enable them to build the r-home this year-. Their ultimate des -ire -is to rezone and develop the property; but this is a heavy burden for them to sustain at this time, All they want to do is build a house. Initial request was to live in the old farmhouse during construction of the new house, 4then abandon the old farmhouse. Were not familiar with the City Code and were told this could not be done under the property's zoning, thereby, precipitating this proposal.