09-07-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MEETING, -AU U41tL 7, 1982 -7- 9. POPOV/BLOMQUIST SITE & BUILDING PLAN: Engineer Bohrer summarized his memo of September 7, 1982, addressing drainage concerns for the proposed development. He recommended that the developers provide a drainage and erosion control plan, that meets City requirements, when a building permit is applied for. --Mark Jordon, building designer and contractor - was unaware of the drainage requirement - ponding area can be developed in the SW corner of the property where there is an existing natural pond. Explained the buildings construction - temporary/permanent building prefabricated superstructure that is screwed together - no nails - can be moved. Exterior will the painted, corri;gated steel, poles will be set in concrete and a pad set -down for the building to stand on. Total cost would be in $30,000 range with a maximum sq. ft. cost of $3.50. --Eder -r still concerned about the value of this structure vs value of of adjacent businesses; also, the fact the building has changed from a temporary to permanent structure. Talked with John Blomquist before this came -to the CoulAcil. __He.. ndicated that when the value of the land would have an impact on the structure it .probably would be removed. Even though.this has frost footings, etc, it has been understood to be a temporary building from the beginning. The intent over time is that this building will be removed. --Popov - all existing structures except the old house will be taken down. Blomquist may take down the house at a later date. --Mottaz - this is not any great change from what is there now. If meets aill requirements, including ponding; has no objection. M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to approve the site and building plans for Boris Popov, Northern Sun Hang Gliders, for a 50 x 200 pole building on(Hig.hway.12 in Sec. 34, provided all City requirements are met, including a drainage/ponding plan. Carried 5-0. 8. ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Bids - Water Tower Painting - Bohrer reviewed the bid tab sheet and exxPTained the worc necessary on the tower. He recommended acceptinq the -base bid from Allied Painting & Renovating, and, budgA-t—permits, Alternate 1, which provides for the repainting of the outside of the tank at an additional cost. M/S/. Morgan/Fraser to accept the low bid from Allied Painting, Discussion - --Bohrer and Whittaker - reviewed the previous work to the outside of the tank. Recommendation for the outside painting is based on the results of Twin City'Testing 's inspection of the inside and outside of the tower. Motion withdrawn. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser to accept the base bid from Allied Painting and Renovating of $9,140 and their alternate bid 1 of $8,000 for a total amount of $17,140 to paint the interior and exterior of the water tower. Motion carried 5-0.