Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO COUNCIL`MEETING <br />OCTOBER'5, 1982 <br />Mayor Eder called the meeting to order to 7:05 p.m. at the City Hall. <br />COUNCILLORS PRESENT: Fraser, Morgan, Mottaz, Novak. Also City Adminis- <br />trator Whittaker. <br />1. AGENDA - Additions: <br />TTO—.C. Contract -for cathodic protection for water tower. <br />13.L. Business Association, Highways 5 and 17 <br />M. Business Association; Use of City Logo. <br />N. Renaming Highlands Trail Ct. N.to Highlands Court North. <br />0. Report, Metro Park Maintenance Committee. <br />P. Metro Chairman, C. Weaver, breakfast meeting. <br />Q. Friday off. <br />M/S/P Morgan/Fraser to adopt the agenda as amended. Carried 5-0. <br />2. MINUTES - M/S/P Morgan/Mottaz to accept the 9/21/82 Lake Elmo <br />Council minutes as amended: Page 3, item B.F. - <br />"M/S/ Morgan/Fraser to adopt R-82-50, a Resolution approving the <br />1983 budget and levy . . . Motion carried 5-9- 4-0, Novak nay." <br />Carried 5-0. --_ ----- ---- <br />3. CLAIMS - M/S/P Morgan/Mottaz to approve the October 5 Claim Nos. <br />83001 thru 83046. <br />4. LICENSES - M/S/P Morgan/Mottaz to approve a license for sewer <br />installer, LeRoux Excavating, Inc., 2112 64th Street, White Bear Lake, <br />MN 55110. Carried 5-0. <br />5. PUBLIC HEARING, VACATION OF PARTS OF DEMONTREVILLE BEACH - Mayor <br />Eder opened the hearing at 7:10 p.m. Whittaker explained that Ms. Orchard <br />and Hubenettes had requested the hearing to vacate the rest of the <br />shoreland along Lanes DeMontreville Country Club (the island) and that <br />most of the land had already been vacated... showed areas on the map. <br />Mr. Galen Meier stated he wants the record cleaned up and property vacated. <br />None present opposed the vacation. <br />M/S/P Morgan/Novak to prepare a Resolution, R-82-52, to consummate <br />the vacation of remaining shoreline along Lanes DeMontreville Country <br />Club. Carried 5-0. <br />The hearing closed at 7:25 p.m. <br />6. HAMMES - <br />A'. Concrete Piles - Dorothy Lyons explained that concrete piles were <br />on south part of property, not visible from road; one week has already <br />been spent breaking up concrete and putting it into piles; next step is <br />crusher has to be moved in and crushed rock used with rest of material <br />and made into salable item. Bill Hammes noted that this material can <br />eventually become an asset, i.e. made into good classified gravel and <br />recycled. <br />--Eder and Mottaz questioned the contract between the County and contractor -- <br />why the Hammes changed their minds, how it relates to the City, etc. <br />--Whittaker - the reason it's a City decision is because we cited Hammes <br />for a nuisance violation when we renewed their mining permit last year; <br />we said we want this stuff out of here, and Hammes said it's not our <br />stuff, it's the County contractor's. The Hammes now would like to keep <br />the material. <br />--Ray Marshal, Attorney - it's the County's contract, City is not a <br />part of it. If the County agreed to hold back money that the City has <br />4 <br />