11-03-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1982 -11- 10. EDGO'RMAN A. Scor'eb'oard Lions Park - Mr. Gorman reported on the decision o several local business' to contribute a scoreboard for Lion's Park. This has been presented to the Park Commission who endorsed and recommended acceptance( of the contribution. Participating business' will take care of the construction and maintenance of the unit. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser to accept the scoreboard, as presented by Ed Gorman, for use in Lion's Park. Carried 5-0. B. Revised Site and Building Plan for White Hat Restaurant - Mr. Gorman presneted a revised plan for the expansion of his restaurant. The revision is for a smaller addition off the south end of the building and a vestibule on the north side. The addition meets the setback requirements. The parking area will be increased to provide for an additional 60 cars. The holding pond will be located more to the south with the parking area graded to drain to the pond. This plan still permits future expansion, as previously, proposed, on the west side of the building. M/S/P Mottaz/Novak to approve the revised site plans for expansion of the White Hat Restaurant for Ed Gorman subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Engineer. The drainage plan will be sent to the City Engineer for review. Motion carried 5-0. 11. ENRIGHT REZONING: Postponed until November 16. 12. EMERSON REZONING: Whittaker reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation(s). He informed the Council that after reviewing the Planning Commission rboommendation-to grant a variance. -to permit Mr. Emerson to move a building onto his property with the City Attorney it was determined such action would not meet the legal requirements of a variance - existing law and City Ordinance would not permit a variance for this in Rural Residential. Three options were cited: 1. Rezone the property,as requested,to Industrial to acknowledge present use and permit the building. 2. Not rezone the property - clarify it as a non -conforming use and identify the extent of the use. 3. Amend the Ordinance to permit larger accessory buildings in RR. --Novak - has this business expanded in the last 5 years? --Bruce Folz - a material/storage shed was put up 10 years ago. identified the size and use of the present buildings. proposing to move in 401x 100' building outlined Emerson's property and identified all surrounding property. Mr. Folz stated the reason this property was not zoned for present use when the Comp Plan and Zoning Ordinance were developed was because it was assumed that 3M would purchase this property for recreational use. Comp Plan notes this property as General Rural. Use - has never been used for this purpose - has been E & H Earthmovers for 20 years. Understood that the Comp Plan was to show or recognize present land use and zone for same.