12-13-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 13, 1982 -8- 5. TIRE RECYCLING PLANT SECTION 32: Mayor Eder reported that he contacted Mr. Wolfgang Kupsipe who was to present his proposal for a tire recycling plant and asked him to pospone his request until January. Mr. Kupsipe agreed. Eder briefly described 'now this type of recycling plant works. BREAK- 10 minutes 3. MANFACTURED HOUSING - CONTINUED: --Mike Ahrens, Cimarron Representative - indicated that he will prepare a written statement on the park operation policy for discussion at a later Council meeting. --Dick Stockstead, Developer of Midland Meadows - appreciated being invited to comment.,- has no strong opinions at this point. Questions the economics of placing a$,"s6,0U0-�3'S,Ouu_,i�ouse-onx_� $20-000 lut. Lots in Midland Meadows are priced from the Nigh teens to the low twenties. Is it economically feasible to place a manfactured home on a platted lot:? --Whittaker - landowner would have to want this type of development and request the appropriate type of zoning. --Willard Morton & Ed Johnson, Midland Meadows - as a landowner sees the cost of the land as a big problem in providing this type of zone. Maybe more economically feasible if the land area were smaller - 1 to 1 V2 acre may be too high. --Whittaker - biggest problem with altering the lot size is the area needed to'treat on -site sewage. Need the 1 1/2 acres to protect the property owner and the sewer system. Two districts have been suggested - urban area where sewer is available and a rural area with 1+ acres. Questions to be addressed - how do we comply with State Statute and how do we handle manfactured housing outside of mobile home parks and the proposed new district. Policy issue - do we want single family lots with manfactured housing and how best to make it happen and how do we deal with lot size and manfactured housing in other districts. --Prince - requested comments from the PLC on MP housing on Single Family lots. Personally does not have an opinion yet. --Dreher - depends on the type of manfactured housing. Would be opposed to a mobile home (trailer) on a City lot - would not oppose a manfactured home that looks like a stick built home - many of these around. --Whittaker - if talking about a mobile home, such as is in Cimarron, do we want to draw a line or should any home that meets the State Code be permitted on any lot in the City. If want to draw i.a: line, where should the line be drawn? --Dreher - would draw the line on a manfactured house less than 16' wide. Would not like to see a 12' wide mobile home in a residential area. --Mottaz - asked, if under the present ordinance, a plan was brought in for a home that looked like a home in Cimarron, but was to be built on a development lot, not moved in, and had similar dimensions would a building permit be issued. --Whittaker - if it meets the UBC a permit would have to be issued. A permit would not have to be issued if it just met the standard for manfactured housing. Discussion followed on the shape of manfactured housing, square vs oblong. --Dreher - appearance is important - units should be compatible to the area.