Laserfiche WebLink
We, the undersigned, object to the proposed method of raising <br />funds for the sealcoating of city streets. We object to an <br />assessment based on a front foot of street, as this method <br />would tax the most those who benefit the least and tax the <br />least those who benefit most. <br />Theoretical Example: <br />A corner lot owner would benefit the least as he <br />lives at the beginning of the street and thus travels <br />the shortest distance on the street, yet he would <br />be taxed the most as he has streets on two sides. The <br />cul-de-sac owner benefits the most as he must travel <br />the full length of the street, yet would be taxed the <br />least as his lot only has a small amount of road <br />frontage. <br />What we propose is a very simple equal assessment per lot <br />in the development or along the street. We further feel <br />that lots located in the same area yet on a county road <br />should not be exempt from pa in their share of the c mmunity <br />maintenance program. I�� � ,�,.�-� a--- ate, ec.�v� <br />s Xir �l� a iiu�j►/Gu,t�. �� �c u 7,tr► '&'k �-} in, �c.� . p t�8 0 /d p <br />124 � �'i <br />S/_,o%93 <br />aj <br />V�'Oty _5 _f57 <br />a <br />