My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-19-83 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1983
>
07-19-83 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:18:57 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:01:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING - 7/19/83 Page 5 <br />• Eder - blacktopping streets are usually not favored by property owners because <br />of assessments; however, it has been proven that paved roads increase property <br />values and pride of ownership. City has made commitment to sealcoat paved <br />streets every 6 years so you'll get that service if street is blacktopped. <br />Would be in favor of calling hearing to have street blacktopped. <br />M/S/P Fraser/Mazzara to deny Colosimo request for platting on unimproved <br />street. (Carried 3-1; Dunn nay) <br />amended M/S/P Eder/Fraser to adopt Resolution 83-4.9*S.ee attachedcorrection sheet. <br />8/2/83 TO HAVE FEASIBILITY STUDY DONE BY ENGINEER (COST PROJECTED AT AROUND <br />$300.00) FOR AUGUST 2, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE SUBJECT OF BRINGING <br />JANE ROAD NORTH AND WEST JAMACA AVENUE UP TO CITY STANDARDS, AND TO HOLD A <br />PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 16, 1983 AT 7:15 p.m. TO DISCUSS"THE FERSIBILITY. <br />(Carried 4-0) <br />8. ENGINEER'S REPORT <br />A. Cost Estimate for Pebble Park LAWCON Application - Bohrer referred to <br />Master Plan forbPeebble Park and to his "COST ESTIMATE" Commission No. 7113-83. <br />Decision has toimade as to what Council wants included in LAWCON grant and scope <br />of project (City matches 50%of LAWCON funding). Bohrer's comments on items <br />listed: (A) Seal cracks and resurface courts. (B & C) Present low (slew) area <br />between hockey rink and skating rink which would require fill; enough fill on <br />site but requires 900 yards of excavation, establishing turf, etc. since rink is <br />difficult to fill because of porous surface. Would recommend leaving slew <br />( between parking lot and tennis courts which is necessary for water runoff. <br />(D) Hill is gravel stockpile without topsoil - needs leveling, topsoil and <br />seeding. (E & F) Neither ballfield has 275' required for regulation slow -pitch <br />field. South field could qualify for little league field; needs seeding, <br />topsoil, ag lime, and backstop replaced. North field has no improvements so <br />would cost $18,640 to complete. (G) 50-gallon per minute well is in -place and <br />alternatives would be (1) water fountain at playground area which is more <br />centrally located; (2) water fountain to service tennis courts and close to <br />skating rinks for filling; and (3) between north and south ballfields so they <br />can be watered. <br />• Bohrer - first 6 improvements would total $40,130, plus water service <br />alternative cost. <br />• Whittaker - what would be point of constructing nonregulation size slow- pitch <br />ballfield such as already exists in Lions Park? (Bohrer - Reid Park would have <br />regulation size fields.) <br />• Bohrer - ballfields can be better orientated; no problem with existing home on <br />northwest corner. Ballplayers play with what is available. <br />® Fraser - we're talking about neighborhood use as compared to tournament use; <br />do we need two ballfields to warrant this cost? <br />• Whittaker - Landfill would be perfect place for regulation size ballfield with <br />off-street parking., <br />s Fraser - this should be referred to Park Commission. (Whittaker - application <br />has to be in by August 5 and Park Commission has cancelled July 25 meeting.) <br />M/S/P Mazzara/Fraser to defer Pebble Park Improvements item to Park Commission <br />which will hold a special meeting for Council recommendation so that the City <br />Council can make a decision at their August 2, 1983 meeting. (Carried 4-0) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.