Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 9-18-84 PAGE 4 <br />2. General Review <br />The City Engineer reviewed with the Council seven Old Village and four <br />Tri-Lakes sewer system locations which require improvements off -site, <br />since soil tests indicate no suitable on -site locations. He plans to <br />meet with these residents and owners of affected land the week of <br />September 24th to discuss the improvements and necessary land <br />acquisition. <br />Bohrer said plans will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency and Environmental Protection Agency, which are funding 94% of <br />the project design and construction, two weeks ].ate. Also, he said <br />the project construction phase will be extended over a five -month <br />period through November, 1985, a month later than originally <br />scheduled. <br />E. Other <br />The Engineer advised the Council of a problem that has occured in the <br />Lanes DeMontreville Country Club Addition. A Stephen Grabski who <br />owned Lots 610 thru 620 and Lots 519 thru 527 (and who is included in <br />the 201 Program) has sold Lots 612 thru 615 and 524 thru 527, along <br />with the existing house to a James Marcio. Mr. Grabski sold Lots 610 <br />and 611 to a Mr. Wackerfuss and retained Lots 616 thru 620 and 519 <br />thru 523 for himself. <br />The Engineer further advised the Council that what Mr. Grabski did was <br />in violation of the City Code (Section 301.090B) which states: <br />Contiguous Parcels: If in a group of two or more contiguous lots or <br />parcels of land owned or controlled by the same person, any individual C <br />lot or parcel does not meet the full width or area requirements of <br />this Ordinance, such individual lot or parcel cannot be considered as <br />a separate parcel of land for purposes of sale or development, but <br />must be combined with adjacent lots or parcels under the same <br />ownership so that the combination of lots or parcels will equal one or <br />more parcels of land each meeting the full lot width and area <br />requiements of this Ordinance; and City Code (Section 301.090F) which <br />states: No yard or lot shall be reduced in area or dimension so as to <br />make it less than the minimum required by this Ordinance, and if the <br />existingyard or lot is less than the minimum required, it shall not be <br />further reduced. No required yard or lot currently used for a builing <br />or dwelling group shall be used to satisfy minimum lot area <br />requirements for any other building. <br />What Mr. Grabski essentially did was to make three non -conforming lots <br />out of one non -conforming lot; and also sold the only acceptable site <br />for a drainfield (Lots 610 and 611) that had been planned for Lots 612 <br />thru 615 and Lots 524 thru 527 where a house now exists and is to be <br />included in the 201 Program. <br />The Council expressed concern over this problem and took the following <br />action., <br />M/S/P Eder/Dunn - To instruct the City Administrator and City <br />Attorney to pursue what appears to be a conflict with the City Code <br />regarding the lot splits in Lanes DeMontreville on the property owned <br />by Steven Grabski. (Motion carried 4-0). <br />