11-18-86 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 10 M/S/P Christ/Mazzara - to reject the proposed rezoning from RR to AG Land south of TH 5, north of Eden park/Downs Lake and east of the Old Village. (Motion carried 5-0). (b) Rezoning of 37 acres of R-1 land to Ag west of Tartan Meadows. M/S/P Christ/Armstrong - to reject the proposed rezoning of 37 acres west of Tartan Meadows from R-1 to Ag. (Motion carried 5-0). (c) Rezoning of 79 acres from RR to Ag on 10th Street. M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - to adopt ordinance no. 7985 Section 301.070C rezoning McNamara's 79 acres on loth Street from RR to Ag. (Motion carried 5-0). (d). Rezoning of RR land owned by Dayton -Hudson and others to Ag. M/S/P Chrst/Morgan - to reject the proposed rezoning of Dayton -Hudson land and other from RR to Ag. (Motion carried 4-1<Dunn: This would be setting people up>). (e). Rezoning of R-1 land to Rural Residential, west side of Jamaca Avenue (parcel number 2550). M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to reject the proposed rezoning of R-1 land west side of Jamaca Avenue (parcel number 2550) to Rural Residential. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - to extend the City Council meeting to 11:15 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0). (f). Rezoning from RR to Agricultural, land located immediately south of the old contaminated county landfill. M/S/P Dunn/Armstrong - to adopt ordinance no. 07988 Nippoldt and. ordinance no. 07987 Richert rezoning land located immediately south of the old contaminated county landfill from RR to Ag. (Motion carried 5-0). 7. Recission of the Interstate Corridor Overlay District The Planning Commission recommended elimination of this overlay district, although there were some members who wanted to keep it and improve.upon it. The concern of the majority of members included the vagueness of the language, the fact that developers could proceed with their project once they had. met these performance standards and the opinion that the overlay district itself was an invitation or encouragement for development along I-94. City Administrator Overby stated that both he and the City Attorney ( feel that there is and will continue to be a need for some type of additional land use/development controls allowing the I-94 corridor, and that it would be better to retain and improve the existing overlay district rather than completely eliminating it.