Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 3, 1987 PAGE 5 <br />General Business zoning, they proceeded to apply for a Conditional <br />Use Permit which was granted. <br />The uses on this property are a home, apartments for his mother <br />and grandmother (not a rental situation), trailer sales, and <br />raising of llamas that are sold as pets. Because these are <br />passive uses, traffic problems are non-existent, impact on <br />surrounding property is minimal or none and the unique character <br />of this property is one that the landowner did not create himself. <br />The hardships are the City's participation in whatever took place <br />in the past and the Highway Dept. came in and took one acre of <br />their land. The property is very difficult to use as it is if you <br />want to call it Agricultural zoning, and is a non -conforming use <br />in that area. Also, Mr. Hanson has had health problems and has <br />been out of work. This has been a business that he was operating <br />as his sole source of livelihood. Farrell felt this was an <br />excellent transitory kind of use for this property. Farrell could <br />not see this situation being a precedent, because you could not <br />find a piece of property in Lake Elmo with all the problems this <br />parcel has. <br />City Administrator Overby had made the following review: <br />Zoning District <br />The proposed building would be located on agriculturally zoned <br />property where the allowed uses are governed by a CUP. The <br />provisions of the CUP must be changed, in order to allow the <br />proposed building. The building must meet all other code <br />requirements. The site is in the I-94 Overlay District. <br />Type of Building Being Proposed <br />The CUP amendment application would permit a 40' x 60' accessory <br />building which would be used as a workshop to service the RV <br />trailer units. The City Council had amended the Hanson CUP on <br />12-15-81 to allow the open sales lot operation subject to three <br />conditions, one of which was that "no permanent structures be <br />built in support• of this use". This condition would have to be <br />deleted or amended in order to allow the proposed building. <br />Building Size and Number <br />The total area of the 40' x 60' building would be 2,400 square <br />feet. Section 301.130 C. of the City Code provides design and <br />performance standards for accessory buildings and structures. <br />Sub -section C-14 indicates that: "For parcels under (10) acres, <br />two buildings with a total area not to exceed one thousand (1,000) <br />square feet..." would be allowed. The Hanson property is 7.91 <br />acres in total area. Therefore, only two accessory buildings <br />could be allowed; although there already exists a 50' x 22' <br />machine shed, a 22' x 16' granary and a 12' x 18' garage on the <br />north. A variance on the number and size of accessory buildings <br />would be required to allow an additional building. <br />