Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 17, 1987 PAGE 5 <br />Univ. of MN who submitted a 6-page report listing his objections to <br />the proposal. <br />Lake Elmo has had experience with poor planning. In the old village <br />the houses were clustered too closely and now their septic systems are <br />malfunctioning and a costly new system must be installed. Building <br />permits are granted to build in flood plains and costly and disruptive <br />remedies are necessary to continue. A garbage dump in a former gravel <br />pit was to become a park or a golf course, but resulted in <br />contamination of groundwater and loss of residential values. With <br />this history, we should be skeptical of any large new development that <br />promises only benefits and no drawbacks and urged the City Council to <br />refuse the PUD application. <br />Mr. Stevens added that he has been a resident for approximately 26 <br />years and does not like high taxes any more than anyone else does, but <br />the more industrialized the towns are, the higher the mill rate. The <br />people who are here applauding this truck stop have been sold a bill <br />of goods and in a few years the taxes will be higher than if they had <br />voted against it. <br />Dale Barns voiced social concerns such as the drug and prostitution <br />problem associated with a truckstop which would only be one-third of a <br />mile away from the school and questionned the cargo being carried. He <br />stated that in Tennessee, 20% of the truckers were found to have drug <br />substances. <br />Tim Mandel, 2479 Lisbon Avenue objected to the application because of <br />the location to Oakland Jr. High School. He felt anyone there would <br />rather have paid higher taxes and prevent something tragic that might <br />happen at the high school. <br />Todd Williams stated there are three factions in Lake Elmo; First: <br />represented by the developer who wants to develop land to the greatest <br />density because he wants the highest return on his investment; Second: <br />represented by the local business owner who wants dense development <br />because he wants more customers; Third: represented by the averge <br />homeowner who wants a nice place to live and is interested in having <br />low taxes and a good value for his home if he should want to sell it. <br />A knowledgable homeowner know that dense development always leads to <br />demand for services which outstrips the taxpayers. Williams presented <br />a graph of taxes and home values for 95 metropolitan communities that <br />the Citizens League had published. The Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan <br />calls for intense land use to go into that area for which sewer is <br />already acceptable and does not prevent uses of people's land. It <br />merely allows uses which are in the best interest of the majority, <br />namely the homeowner. There are many ways to develop the land outside <br />of the MUSA line which meet the desires of both the business owner and <br />the homeowners. A truckstop is not one of these uses. Even if by <br />some miracle this development doesn't call for an increase in city <br />services, it will degrade the environment and will lead to other <br />developments which will lead to an untimely expansion of services and <br />expansion of the tax bill. Williams urged the Council to reject this <br />proposed development at this location. <br />