My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-07-89 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1989
>
02-07-89 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:22:29 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:14:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 7, 1.989 PAGE 6 <br />Discussion followed as to the number of parking spaces that should be <br />allowed. The code requires 16 spaces, Mr. Hagstrom requested 7 spaces. <br />Councilman Hunt clarified his motion was approval for 7 parking spaces. <br />Councilman Graves preferred the 9 parking spaces because this was a <br />lesser variance. <br />M/S/P Williams/Graves - to amend the motion to include approval of 9 <br />Parking spaces. (Motion carried 4-1 Hunt: he believes 7 parking spaces <br />were adequate). <br />Discussion on whether the parking lot and driveway should be gravel. <br />Mr. Hagstrom preferred the PZ recommendation of gravel coverage for the <br />parking area with a blacktop driveway because this would help the <br />impervious drainage situation. <br />M/S/F Hunt/Williams - to amend the motion to include the applicant does <br />not need to blacktop the parking area until he has to do it. (Motion <br />failed 0-5 No hardship was demonstrated.) <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to call. the question. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to approve the Site Plan Review for proposed <br />alterations to Savanna Designs at 3511 Lake Elmo Avenue; variances be <br />granted for the impervious surface coverage, parking to allow 9 parking <br />spaces, require blacktopping of parking area and driveway, based on the <br />hardship the General Business Ordinance does not provide for explicit <br />zoning provision for the Old Village Area to enable propertyowners to <br />remodel their existing businesses. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />Councilman Hunt stated if the PZ could set standards for the Old Village <br />area in a timely manner, Mr. Hagstrom would have the option of asking <br />Council to approve amending their decision on granting of variances. <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - the City Council urges the Planning Commission to <br />proceed with revision/amendment to the General Business Ordinance to <br />provide for explicit zoning provisions for the Old Village Area, <br />including the reasonableness of creating an historic district for this <br />area (Motion carried 5-0). <br />F. Large Lot Subdivision: Washenberger/Ziertman <br />Robert and Dorothy Ziertman, 10193 60th St., has applied for a Large Lot <br />Subdivision to create a lot of 11.5 acres for his daughter, Diane <br />Washenberger to build a house on. This application meets all <br />requirements for a lot in the Rural Residential Zoning District. <br />At their 1/23/89 meeting, the PZ recommended approval by the City <br />Council for a Large Lot Subdivision of 11.5 acres to Robert <br />Ziertman/Diane Washenberger at Keats and TH36; subject to the applicant <br />providing a survey wth legal descriptions for the newly created lot and <br />remaining Ziertman property and the applicant pay a park dedication fee <br />of $450.00for the newly created lot. (Motion carried 9-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.