04-04-89 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

contamination will have been spread, at however low a concentration, into previously clean, UNcontaminated areas of our City. It is clear that, as long as spray irrigation is allowed to continue at increasing levels, the landfill will NOT be cleaned up. The residents near the landfill and the rest of our City will be safe ONLY after the landfill has been cleaned up. It is my belief that proceeding with the proposed discharge will only prolong the application of "bandaid" approaches such as spray irrigation of contaminated water, and will delay the true cleanup of the old landfill. As a matter of principle, I cannot support a decision which will prolong the agony which Lake Elmo and its residents continuo to suffer because of the Lake Jane Landfill, without some promise of a definite end to the suffering. As far as I know, the Counties have no plans to end the suffering. Thus, I intend to vote against this agreement. I do not intend to belittle the efforts of those who bargained for it. It would be a good agreement IF it were contingent on some plan to remove the source of contamination. This in fact has been my position for many months. Let me read a sentence from a letter I wrote to the City dated June 13, 1988, almost a year ago: "In summary, the proposed discharge should be allowed onyx; if it is part of a carefully planned and definite program to actually clean out the contamination of the old landfill." Some say that the Counties have been generous in their granting of concessions in this agreement. They say, "If Lake Elmo does not enter this agreement, the Counties will go ahead and do the discharge anyway, and Lake Elmo will lose all leverage." In my opinion there is not much to lose. The increased frequency of testing will only continue for the first year if the results are clean. For most of the chemicals involved, the drinking water standards are not that different from surface water standards; some are higher, and some are lower. Once the 12 homes along Eagle Point Creek have had their wells tested as a baseline, no other testing will be provided. And I am told this baseline test will only cost about 51.00 per well. Thus, I do not see that Lake Elmo and its residents will be losing much by not entering into this agreement. And why are the Counties blackmailing Lake Elmo by not volunteering to do these things anyway? They are the morally right things to do. The Counties do not at present have to clean up the landfill. The Counties at present do not even need Lake Elmo's permission to pump water off the site. I want to make it clear that Lake Elmo is entering this agreement only under extreme duress. It is my hope that, futile though it may be, my voting against this agreement will make someone, somewhere down the line think just a little harder about actually cleaning up this cancerous sore in our City. The agony of our City will be in the record, and maybe, just maybe, someone in a position of authority will be affected positively and have the courage to say, "Stop! Enough is enough. It is time to stop treating this cancer with bandaids and remove it once and for all."