Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Timothy K. Scherkenbach <br />March 20, 1990 <br />Page Seven <br />In conclusion, it is the City's assertion that it did follow the budget period extension <br />notice process. The assertion that the City did not "request" a time extension is a <br />false one because the City is required to give notice. <br />All previous correspondence from the City of Lake Elmo to the MPCA on this matter <br />as listed below should be considered a part of the record: <br />January 23, 1989 <br />June 29, 1989 <br />August 31, 1989 <br />November 13, 1989 <br />November 14, 1989 <br />Attached to the previous correspondence were the following documents which are <br />also a part of the record: <br />District Court Order Granting Petition and Vesting Title and Possession, dated <br />February 23, 1989. <br />District Court's Notice of Filing and Entry of Judgment awarding damages, <br />interest, and costs, dated September 20, 1989. <br />District Court's Notice of Filing and Entry of Amended Judgment awarding <br />damages, interest, mid costs, dated November 8, 1989. <br />Minnesota Statutes 117.145, 117.165, 117,175, and 117.195, <br />