My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-90 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1990
>
03-20-90 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:00:36 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:17:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 30, 1990 PAGE 3 <br />Glen Smith, Lake Elmo VFW Building Committee, stated we have an <br />on -site system and you have a grass cutting charge for the VFW. We <br />have a janitor cut our grass. If there are inspections made, they <br />should inform us so we can be there when they inspect the system. We <br />don't want a charge if nobody comes around to inspect the system. <br />Mike Severin, 8012 50th Street, stated he came to the meeting hoping <br />to get his sewer charge lowered. They haven't moved the mound once. <br />I like to pay for what I get. <br />Mayor Dunn read into record the Council received letters indicating <br />their position on the proposed increase from Charles Kent, 3060 Lisbon <br />Avenue, and from Evelyn Kramer, 10949 32nd Street. <br />Mayor Dunn closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. <br />Mayor Dunn voiced her concern on the large increase all at one time, <br />but realizing the fund should be self-sustaining. She would like to <br />see a variation from a single resident to a multiple unit because of <br />the various levels of necessary maintenance. <br />Councilwoman Armstrong pointed out, in Larry Bohrer's letter to the <br />Council, the actual charge is for the treatment and not maintenance. <br />It is a large increase, but with the increased rates for next year, <br />the City will be in a better situation because we cannot let this fund <br />go under. <br />Larry Bohrer indicated the City could make each of the 7 or 8 systems <br />more individualized as far as keeping track of maintenance. This can <br />be done, but if there is a repair, it would be a very large <br />expenditure at one time just for those people on that system. This <br />would make rates very peaky and, fluctuate greatly from year to year. <br />The City can adopt keeping the rate at $120 or go the high end of $180 <br />as recommended, but if the adopted fee is lower the city is assuming <br />more risk. If there is a repair during that year, the city will have <br />to subsidize that fund. <br />Councilman Hunt stated our current rates are lower, even with the <br />suggested change, than any of the other 201 systems in the area. Even <br />with the adjustment we seem to be in line with sewer charges, ranging <br />from $30-$50 per quarter, in the Metro area. <br />Councilman Graves voiced his surprise at the audit cost representing <br />such a large percentage of the total annual income. He suggested <br />asking the Finance Director to see if the costs could be brought <br />closer into line with the audit cost relative to the rest of the <br />budget. <br />See Attachment for Councilman Williams' comments on agenda item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.