03-20-90 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 30, 1990 PAGE 5 their driveways, and the road is straight and there ae no hills. This would be a very safe design. Bohrer asked for Council direction on if the shoulder width should be widened from 6 feet to 8 feet. Since we have already advertised for bids, he would like to extend the bid date two weeks to April 12, 1990 to allow time to revise the plans. See Attachment for Councilman Williams' comments on agenda item. M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to direct the City Engineer to request approval, as first priority, for 15th Street construction plan with a 6 feet wide shoulder; if the State Aid Engineer does not approve of the plan without the 8 feet wide shoulder, the Council authorizes the City Engineer to submit construction plans with an 8 feet wide shoulder and approves extending the bid date two weeks to April 12, 1.990 to allow time to revise the plans. (Motion carried 3-0-1 Abstain: Armstrong). D. Status Appeal Larry Bohrer provided the Council copies 20, 1990, to Mr. T. K. Sherkenback, Dir. The purpose of this .letter was to provide documentation of those costs for land and resulting from the appeal and judgment on Treatment Works Project and Grant. 6. PLANNING/LAND USE/AND ZONING: A. Comprehensive Plan of the letter, dated March of Div. of Water Quality. justification and related acquisiton costs Site D, for the 201 The Council reviewed the Future Land Use Map which included the revisions made by the Council at its March 15th workshop and they discussed the 3.3 average lot size density for the new flexible zoning district. Councilman Hunt felt the 3.3 average lot size density was close to what was developed by a committee composed of PZ members and CC members two years ago. This was a blending of the 5 and 2.5 acre zoning together and coming up with an applicable figure of 3.3. He could support the figure of 3 per 10 acres and as the ordinance is drafted the minimum and maximum lot size requirement will be determined. Councilman Graves stated he thought 3 per 10 acres was an appropriate lot size density with a reasonable minimum and maximum lot size defined. Councilwoman Armstrong agreed with the proposed 3 per 10 acres as was discussed at the workshop. If the Council agrees with the 3 per 10 acres, then the Council can go forward on the map and work out the details of the zoning later. See Attachment for comments on Future Land Use Map and average lot density from Councilman Williams.