My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-90 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1990
>
03-20-90 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:00:36 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:17:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor and City Council <br />From: T. R. Williams <br />Subject: CIP Committee Recommendation on New Dump Truck <br />Date: March 12, 1990 - <br />on March 12, 1990, Mayor Dunn and I met with Dan Olinger, the Public Works <br />Supervisor. The subject of our meeting was discussion about whether or not <br />the Council should award a bid for a new dump truck. Below are a number of <br />conclusions we came to regarding this purchase.and other capital purchases <br />planned for Lake Elmo in the future. <br />1. Because our citizens rely on the proper functioning of all City <br />equipment, especially in the winter, it is proper to replace old equipment <br />on a regular basis. In this way the City can have a high level of <br />confidence that its equipment will be available when needed. <br />2. For at least the last three years, Lake Elmo has had a formal capital <br />improvement program or plan (CIP) to plan for the replacement of major <br />equipment. This CIP now includes virtually all the hardware items owned by <br />the City: trucks, plows, mowers, office equipment, etc. Prior to 1986, <br />items were assigned replacement periods, but no formal, considered <br />replacement schedule was in place. <br />3. The current CIP includes the philosophy of spacing out purchases of <br />major mechanical equipment, especially for the Fire Department and for the <br />Public Works Department, so that there are not years in which much money <br />is spent, followed by years in which no money is spent. The goal is to <br />have an even level of expenditure over the years. With the number of items <br />owned by the City, this goal can only be met approximately. Once such a <br />CIP is in place, changing the schedule on a major item can seriously <br />disrupt the desired even level of purchases. The problem is that each item <br />is on its own depreciation schedule, independent of any other item. <br />4. The subject truck was ordered at the end of 1982, but it is a 1983 <br />model. It has over 30,000 miles on it, mostly snow -plowing miles. Repairs <br />for 1989 were just over $5000. Expected repairs to make the truck worthy <br />of another year are about $2500, none of which is in the budget. A delay <br />of one year will reduce trade-in value by.$2500-$5000. Unplanned but very <br />possible major repairs include engine and transmission rebuilding for <br />$5000-$14000. The cab and box are beginning to show rust and should be <br />repainted if we keep it for another year. The truck has been on a seven <br />year replacement schedule since its purchase. <br />5. The low bid provides for replacement of a seven-year old $52000 unit <br />($45000 original truck and $7000 added equipment) with a functionally <br />equivalent brand new $60000 unit for $38000 plus a $22000 trade-in. <br />The consensus of the CIP Committee was to recommend that the City Council <br />proceed to award the bid to the low bidders for the truck and the plow <br />package. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.