My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-90 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1990
>
06-19-90 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:00:37 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:17:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 PAGE 2 <br />At the last Council meeting, the applicant submitted information for <br />Council review and requested consideration be postponed until the June <br />19th Council meeting. <br />Mayor Dunn reviewed the information submitted and visited the site and <br />thought Mr. Kiesling did a fantastic job on remodelling the house. <br />She noted the old newspaper article and picture which showed the <br />existing Keane house having an attached deck. Dunn pointed out <br />Kiesling has a patio that extends out 14' on the bottom level which <br />was allowed by the DNR. Kiesling stated he would consider a 4' walkway <br />and Dunn felt a narrower walkway would not go out any further than the <br />concrete patio already existing. <br />Councilman Hunt recalled when the house was abandoned it had a deck <br />attached to it. Hunt believed the house could have been raised with <br />the deck still attached which would have preserved the deck and the <br />non-comformity. Hunt referred to Council approval of a similar <br />situation, a deck was to be demolished and a new deck created. In case <br />of an emergency, Mr. Kiesling does not have access to the water so <br />there is a safety factor. Hunt considered the addition of a walkway <br />did not increase the non -conformity that existed prior to Mr. Kiesling <br />owning the house. He also took the opinion that the shoreline has been <br />recontured and was no longer lakebed. <br />Councilman Williams noted he did not see a hardship for granting this <br />variance. The DNR does not recommend approval, and, in the past, the <br />Council has tried to go along with the DNR recommendations. Mr. <br />Kiesling bought the house "as is" knowing work had to be done because <br />the house was unliveable. According to our code when a structure is <br />non -conforming and is damaged more than 50% of its value, Williams <br />pointed out it should not be replaced. By adding the walkway and <br />stairs to the walkway, he is increasing the degree of non-comformity. <br />Councilwoman Armstrong referred to Molly Shoedeen's letter, July 20, <br />1989, stating the DNR allows only raising the home on fill and clearly <br />states that no deck be allowed. Also the City received a letter, May <br />10, 1990, John Stine, DNR, stating they have repeatedly stated they <br />would not approve any further waterward encroachment on this site and <br />was opposed to the variance for the walkway. The City's Building <br />Official told Mr. Kiesling not to put sliding glass doors in, he went <br />ahead and put them in, and now he is claiming the three sliding glass <br />doors going nowhere as a hardship. The DNR recommends not granting a <br />variance for a walkway, and we should abide by the DNR's wishes. <br />A variance request requires a majority vote of the Council. The <br />applicant requested postponement for consideration of his request <br />until the next Council meeting. <br />M/S/P Hunt/Dunn - at the request of the applicant, the Council <br />postponed the request by Joseph Kiesling for a variance and shoreland <br />permit until the next City Council meeting. (Motion carried 3-1: <br />Williams: based on reasons stated). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.