My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-05-91 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1991
>
02-05-91 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 6:21:03 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:19:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Meeting Date _ February 5. 1991 <br />Ar ry DA SECTION <br />1TE%i: <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />Prosecution Procedures: Carl Blondin <br />AIL <br />10B. <br />ORiG►NATING <br />DEPARTMENT: <br />By: <br />APPROVED FOR <br />AGENDA BY: <br />There have been concerns raised in the past that "In the 30 mph zone on Lake <br />Elmo Avenue N., traffic is allowed to travel at 39 mph or less without <br />receiving a citation. This fact was attested to by two officers from the <br />Washington County Sheriff's Department, the reason given is that the County <br />Judges throw these cases out of court if contested by the offender because the <br />City of Lake Elmo will not prosecute these cases due to the expense involved." <br />(See August 9, 1990 memo to Mayor and City Council from Richard A. Acree). <br />I have met with Mr. Blondin, our prosecuting attorney, and he has explained in <br />detail the procedure for getting a traffic violation to court. <br />That procedure is as follows: <br />1. Violator speeds in Lake Elmo <br />2. Deputy or state patrol officer may or may not observe violation. <br />3. If observed, the deputy or state patrol officer mak -�s a decision whether or <br />net to stop violation. Observation could be made by radar, airplane clock, or <br />accar computer, which is used by the state patrol. <br />4. If deputy or state trooper stops violator, he/she makes a decision whether <br />or not to issue citation. <br />5. If issued a citation, the vast majority of violators pay fine and never <br />appear in court. <br />6. If citation is challenged, violator appears at arraignment (first <br />appearance) in district court. <br />7. .Judge asks for a guilty or not guilty plea. The judge has no authority to <br />reduce charges without consulting prosecutor. <br />S. If violator pleads not guilty, the matter is set for trial (if petty <br />misdemeanor, a pretrial conference is set). <br />9. Our attorney does not plea bargin, but will suggest a reduced fire of about <br />$10.00 for a guilty plea. <br />10. Our attorney will also suggest a reduced fine if for some reason the citir.a <br />officer is unavailable to testify. This happens on very rare occassions <br />because an officer retires, moves, or has an emergency that would prevent them <br />from testifying. - <br />-1. Our attorney has approximately a 95`: conviction rate. <br />12. If a judge arbitrarily "tosses out" a case, on his/her own accord, the <br />judge can be disciplined. Mr. Blondin has indicated he would not hesitate in <br />bringing disciplinary action against a judge if he thought it appropriate. <br />Mr. Blondin will be at the meeting to address any concerns may have on <br />this procedure. y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.