My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-01-91 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1991
>
10-01-91 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 6:20:54 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:19:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 1, 1991 4 <br />Hunt: I feel item #3 is important to the city because this city <br />is trying to send a positive message by saying we are going to <br />rezone the land within that MUSA. We should then carry that thru <br />and rezone the remainder of the City. <br />Councilman Mottaz: If we ask the City Attorney he will tell us <br />there are differences of opinion in interpreting that Statute <br />about controls. I have talked to more attorneys who disagree <br />with our attorney than those who agree. <br />Mayor Johnson: In the case of Anton versus City of Eagan, the <br />supreme court stated that the master plan, as referred to the <br />comp plan, does not unalterably hold the city to a rezoning. <br />Although not abiding by the comp plan would be one part of <br />evidence for support of arbitrainess. <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to amend the amendment to include the <br />following changes: <br />3. At the same time, to request an extension of the MUSA and an <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from the metropolitan <br />Council, in accordance with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation, to the 1/4 section line north of I-94 from Inwood <br />Avenue to the 1/4 Section line east of Keats Avenue and an <br />additional area including to the 1/2 section line north of I-94 <br />by 1/2 mile east of Inwood Avenue, except for an additional area <br />including the 1/2 section line north of I-94 by 1/4 mile to the <br />west and 1/4 mile to the east of Keats Avenue. <br />5. If items #1 and #2 are not accomplished within 75 days, the <br />application to the Met Council for the extension of the MUSA and <br />amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be withdrawn, or if the <br />Met Council has already approved the MUSA Extension, the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall be null and void. <br />6. At our earliest opportunity, the city set up a public hearing <br />for the purpose of enacting a moratorium on development with the <br />proposed MUSA defined area. (Motion carried 3-2: Williams:same <br />reasons as stated above, Hunt: I strongly support the Comp Plan <br />of this City and strongly support the extension of the MUSA. I <br />am very troubled at the position we are in tonight. What <br />troubles me is I see something that is good for the city and the <br />ability to do something good for the City. I also see an <br />unwillingness for some members of this Council to follow this <br />comp plan. I have seen that occur in a recent case that went to <br />Court. Every time a proposal comes in near the MUSA it will <br />probably be turned down by this council unless it is for <br />commercial.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.